RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.10.23284385
DO 10.1101/2023.01.10.23284385
A1 Una Foye
A1 Rebecca Appleton
A1 Patrick Nyikavaranda
A1 Natasha Lyons
A1 Ceri Dare
A1 Chris Lynch
A1 Karen Persaud
A1 Nafiso Ahmed
A1 Ruth Stuart
A1 Merle Schlief
A1 Xia Huong
A1 Nick Sevdalis
A1 Luke Sheridan-Rains
A1 Antonio Rojas-Garcia
A1 Martin Stefan
A1 Jeremy Clark
A1 Alan Simpson
A1 Sonia Johnson
A1 Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/11/2023.01.10.23284385.abstract
AB Background Mental health acute and crisis care consumes a large share of mental health budgets internationally but is often experienced as unsatisfactory and difficult to access. As a result, there is an increasing move towards developing innovative community crisis services, to improve patient experience and relieve pressure on inpatient and emergency services. This study aims to understand what helps and hinders the implementation of innovative mental health crisis care projects in England.Methods Using a qualitative approach, 18 interviews were conducted with crisis care service managers exploring their experiences and views of the development and implementation of their service developed with support from an English national capital funding programme. A framework analysis was conducted informed by implementation science.Results Key facilitators to implementation of innovative crisis services included bottom-up development, service user involvement, strong collaborative working, and leadership and management buy-in. Key barriers that affected the projects implementation included the complexities of crisis care, workforce challenges and resourcing issues.Conclusion There is a recognised need to improve, update, and innovate current crisis care offers. Results from this study suggest that a range of models can help address the heterogenous needs of local populations and that such services can be successfully implemented where they utilise a whole-systems approach, involving service users and relevant professional stakeholders beyond mental health services in planning and developing the service.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis paper presents independent research commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme, conducted by the NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit (MHPRU). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or its arm's length bodies, or other government departments. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed by the Research Director of Noclor, the North London Research Consortium, which provides research governance services for several London NHS Trusts, who confirmed it met Health Research Authority (HRA) criteria (2013), to be classed as a service evaluation and formal ethical review was not required. Participants were given written information regarding the purpose of the study, aspects of confidentiality (and their limits), and the extent and limits of confidentiality including publication of anonymised quotes. Staff could decline to take part or withdraw at any stage.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript