PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nethery, Rachel C.
AU  - Testa, Christian
AU  - Tabb, Loni P.
AU  - Hanage, William P.
AU  - Chen, Jarvis T.
AU  - Krieger, Nancy
TI  - Addressing spatial misalignment in population health research: a case study of US congressional district political metrics and county health data
AID  - 10.1101/2023.01.10.23284410
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.01.10.23284410
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/11/2023.01.10.23284410.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/11/2023.01.10.23284410.full
AB  - Areal spatial misalignment, which occurs when data on multiple variables are collected using mismatched boundary definitions, is a ubiquitous obstacle to data analysis in public health and social science research. As one example, the emerging sub-field studying the links between political context and health in the United States faces significant spatial misalignment-related challenges, as the congressional districts (CDs) over which political metrics are measured and administrative units, e.g., counties, for which health data are typically released, have a complex misalignment structure. Standard population-weighted data realignment procedures can induce measurement error and invalidate inference, which has prompted the development of fully model-based approaches for analyzing spatially misaligned data. One such approach, atom-based regression models (ABRM), holds particular promise but has scarcely been used in practice due to the lack of appropriate software or examples of implementation. ABRM use “atoms”, the areas created by intersecting all sets of units on which variables of interest are measured, as the units of analysis and build models for the atom-level data, treating the atom-level variables (generally unmeasured) as latent variables. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility and strengths of the ABRM in a case study of the association between political representatives’ voting behavior (CD-level) and COVID-19 mortality rates (county-level) in a post-vaccine period. The adjusted ABRM results suggest that more conservative voting record is associated with an increase in COVID-19 mortality rates, with estimated associations smaller in magnitude but consistent in direction with those of standard realignment methods. The results also indicate that ABRM may enable more robust confounding adjustment and more realistic uncertainty estimates, properly representing the uncertainties arising from all analytic procedures. We also implement the ABRM in modern optimized Bayesian computing programs and make our code publicly available, which may enable these methods to be more widely adopted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by NIH grant 1K0ES032458.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used only openly available human data that were obtained from CDC Wonder (https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10-provisional.html) and the US Census Bureau (https://data.census.gov/).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the present study are publicly available and can be obtained from CDC Wonder (https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10-provisional.html) and the US Census Bureau (https://data.census.gov/). https://github.com/rachelnethery/atom_model