TY - JOUR T1 - Clinical Validation of Optical Genome Mapping for the Detection of Structural Variations in Hematological Malignancies JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.12.27.22283973 SP - 2022.12.27.22283973 AU - Andy Wing Chun Pang AU - Karena Kosco AU - Nikhil Sahajpal AU - Arthi Sridhar AU - Jen Hauenstein AU - Benjamin Clifford AU - Joey Estabrook AU - Alex Chitsazan AU - Trilochan Sahoo AU - Anwar Iqbal AU - Ravindra Kolhe AU - Gordana Raca AU - Alex R. Hastie AU - Alka Chaubey Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/29/2022.12.27.22283973.abstract N2 - Structural variations (SVs) play a key role in the pathogenicity of hematological malignancies. Standard-of-care (SOC) methods such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), employed globally for the past three decades have significant limitations in the resolution or the number of recurrent aberrations that can be simultaneously assessed, respectively. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based technologies are now widely used to detect clinically significant sequence variants but are limited in their ability to accurately detect SVs. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging technology enabling the genome-wide detection of all classes of SVs at a significantly higher resolution than karyotyping and FISH. OGM neither requires cultured cells nor amplification of DNA and hence addresses the limitations of culture and amplification biases. This study reports the clinical validation of OGM as a laboratory developed test (LDT), according to CLIA guidelines, for genome-wide SV detection in different hematological malignancies. In total, 68 cases with hematological malignancies (of various subtypes), 27 controls and two cancer cell lines were used for this study. Ultra-high molecular weight DNA was extracted from the samples, fluorescently labeled, and run on the Bionano Genomics Saphyr system. A total of 207 datasets, including replicates, were generated and 100% could be analyzed successfully. Sample data were then analyzed using either disease specific or pan-cancer specific BED files to prioritize calls that are known to be diagnostically or prognostically relevant. Accuracy, precision, PPV and NPV were all 100% against standard of care results. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility were 100%, 100% and 96%, respectively. Following the validation, 11 cases were run and analyzed using OGM at three additional sites. OGM found more clinically relevant SVs compared to SOC testing due to its ability to detect all classes of SVs at much higher resolution. The results of this validation study demonstrate OGM’s superiority over traditional SOC methods for the detection of SVs for the accurate diagnosis of various hematological malignancies.Competing Interest StatementAWCP, KK, AS, JH, BC, JE, AC, TS, AH, AC are all salaried employees of Bionano Genomics RK has received honoraria, and/or travel funding, and/or research support from Illumina, Asuragen, QIAGEN, Perkin Elmer Inc, Bionano Genomics, Agena, Agendia, PGDx, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cepheid, and BMS.Funding StatementThis study was funded in part by Bionano Genomics, inc.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB and consent IRB 20212956 Bionano Genomics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA IRB 00007527 University of Rochester Medical Center Office for Human Subject Protection IRB A 00000150 (HAC IRB 611298) Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USAI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available upon reasonable request and in accordance with IRB protocols. ER -