RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Systematised Review of the Beighton Score Compared with Other Commonly Used Measurement Tools for Assessment and Identification of Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.25.22274226
DO 10.1101/2022.04.25.22274226
A1 Alexander, Malini
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/21/2022.04.25.22274226.abstract
AB Objective A systematised review compared validity and reliability of the Beighton Score to those of other commonly used scores for identification of generalised joint hypermobility (GJH)Methods Inclusion criteria: English language, studies on humans, all types of study designs, publications in academic journals, publications from the year two thousand onwards, publications in print and theses. Exclusion criteria: studies not in English, studies measuring single joints only, studies published before the year 2000, cadaveric studies, papers with only abstracts available. An electronic literature search was undertaken of Pub Med/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, SPORT Discus, Pedro databases, followed by a manual search. The final review included 73 papers. The PRISMA (2021) COSMIN (2010) guidelines and CASP (2019) criteria were used to evaluate methodological quality and bias.Results The Beighton Score’s Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability ranged between ICC 0.74-0.99 and ICC 0.72-0.98 respectively. The BS has reasonable intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, however validity cannot be accurately determined as incorporation bias was identified as an issue in study methodology, not previously identified in the literature.Conclusion Paucity of data prevented accurate assessment of other scoring systems. Urgent research is required to clarify these issues and compare the BS to other tests. No source of funding was received in in undertaking this review. This review was not registered.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/prisma-s/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00296-021-04832-4I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available in the supplementary materialsGJHGeneralised Joint HypermobilityJHJoint hypermobilityHSDHypermobile Spectrum DisorderH-EDSHypermobile Ehlers Danlos SyndromeBSBeighton ScoreROMRange of motionHDTCHereditable Disorders of Connective Tissue