RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Transparency in infectious disease research: a meta-research survey of specialty journals
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.11.11.22282231
DO 10.1101/2022.11.11.22282231
A1 Zavalis, Emmanuel A.
A1 Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina G.
A1 Ioannidis, John P.A.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/13/2022.11.11.22282231.abstract
AB Introduction Infectious diseases carry a large global burden and have implications for society at large. Therefore, reproducible, transparent research is extremely important. To assess the current state of transparency in this field, we investigated code sharing, data sharing, protocol registration, conflict of interest and funding disclosures in articles published in the most influential infectious disease journals.Methods We evaluated transparency indicators in the 5340 PubMed Central Open Access (PMC OA) articles published in 2019 or 2021 in the 9 most-cited specialty journals in infectious disease. We used a previously validated text-mining R package, rtransparent. The approach was manually validated for a random sample of 200 articles for which study characteristics were also extracted in detail. Main comparisons assessed 2019 versus 2021 articles, 2019 versus 2021 non-COVID-19 articles, and 2021 non-COVID-19 articles versus 2021 COVID-19 articles.Results A total of 5340 articles were evaluated (1860 published in 2019 and 3480 in 2021 (of which 1828 on COVID-19)). Text-mining identified code sharing in 98 (2%) articles, data sharing in 498 (9%), registration in 446 (8%), conflict of interest disclosures in 4209 (79%) and funding disclosures in 4866 (91%). There were substantial differences across the 9 journals in the proportion of articles fulfilling each transparency indicator: 1-9% for code sharing, 5-25% for data sharing, 1-31% for registration, 7-100% for conflicts of interest, and 65-100% for funding disclosures. There were no major differences between articles published in 2019 and non-COVID-19 articles in 2021. In 2021, non-COVID-19 articles had more data sharing (12%) than COVID-19 articles (4%). Validation-corrected imputed estimates were 3% for code sharing, 11% for data sharing, 8% for registrations, 79% for conflict of interest disclosures and 92% for funding disclosures.Conclusion Data sharing, code sharing, and registration are very uncommon in infectious disease specialty journals. Increased transparency is required.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe code and data generated and analyzed for this study is available in https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FYZPX (for the code and datasets, as well as the protocol). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FYZPX