PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chacon, L
AU  - Mitchell, G
AU  - Golder, S.
TI  - THE COMMERCIAL PROMOTION OF ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND ITS INFLUENCE ON VAPING INITIATION AND POSITIVE PERCEPTIONS OF VAPING IN ANGLOPHONE COUNTRIES: A SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL
AID  - 10.1101/2022.11.11.22282178
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.11.11.22282178
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/11/2022.11.11.22282178.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/11/2022.11.11.22282178.full
AB  - Introduction Social media plays a protagonist role in the promotion of addictive substances targeting vulnerable and susceptible groups including adolescents and young adults in contemporary times. Despite the broad evidence of tobacco promotion on popular social media, electronic cigarette advertisement remains a recent public health concern, as is considered an emerging phenomenon. Further research must be developed to address this topic, contributing to improved regulation of the marketing of vaping products.Aims and Objectives The proposed scoping review aims to clarify key concepts related to e-cigarette promotion on social media, synthesise the relevant evidence related to the topic, and identify gaps that will contribute to further research and policymaking enhancement.Identifying Studies The databases Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic (CDSR) and CENTRAL will be used to search for relevant studies by using a range of keywords in the search strategy.Study Selection Studies must comprise individuals over 10 years old living in core anglophone countries. Eligible studies must evaluate the promotion of e-cigarettes on accessible social media platforms, and its influence on vaping uptake and positive perception among the research population. The screening and extraction stage will be held on Covidence through three independent reviews and results will be displayed via a PRISMA flowchart.Reporting the results Extracted data will be reported through a table and the results presented using a narrative summary. No assessment for risk bias or formal synthesis will be included as this is a scoping review. The results will provide relevant information and recommendations for prospective research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript