RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the Covid-19 pandemic 2020-21
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.25.22281247
DO 10.1101/2022.10.25.22281247
A1 Bonde, Jens Peter Ellekilde
A1 Mølenberg Begtrup, Luise
A1 Høy Jensen, Johan
A1 Flachs, Esben Meulengracht
A1 Schlünssen, Vivi
A1 Kolstad, Henrik Albert
A1 Jakobsson, Kristina
A1 Nielsen, Christel
A1 Nilsson, Kerstin
A1 Rylander, Lars
A1 Vilhelmsson, Andreas
A1 Petersen, Kajsa Ugelvig
A1 Tøttenborg, Sandra Søgaard
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/26/2022.10.25.22281247.abstract
AB Objectives Most earlier studies on occupational risk of Covid-19 covering the entire workforce are based on relatively rare outcomes such as hospital admission and mortality. This study examines the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupational group based upon real-time polymerase chain reaction tests (RT-PCR).Methods The cohort includes 2.4 million Danish employees, 20-69 years of age. All data were retrieved from public registries. The sex-specific incidence rate ratios (IRR) of first-occurring positive RT-PCR test from week 8 of 2020 through week 50 of 2021 were computed by Poisson regression for each 4-digit DISCO-08 job code with more than 100 employees (337 in men; 297 in women). Occupational groups with low risk of workplace infection according to a job exposure matrix constituted the reference group. Risk estimates were adjusted by demographic, social and health characteristics including household size, completed Covid-19 vaccination, pandemic wave and occupation-specific frequency of testing.Results IRR’s of SARS-CoV-2 infection were elevated in 34 occupations comprising 12 % of male employees and 45 occupations comprising 41 % of female employees. All IRR estimates were below 2.0. Decreased IRRs were observed in 85 occupations in men but none in women.Discussion We observed a modestly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees in numerous occupations indicating a large potential for preventive actions, especially in the female workforce. Cautious interpretation of observed risk in specific occupations is needed because of methodological issues inherent in analyses of RT-PCR-test results and because of multiple statistical tests.WHAT IS ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC?Epidemiological studies suggest that the workplace contribute to the Covid-19 pandemicResults are mostly based upon studies of less frequent outcomes as Covid-19 morbidity or mortality which limits inference about risk in specific occupationsWHAT THIS STUDY ADDSThe risk of Covid-19 infection was increased in 34 of 337 occupations in men and in 45 of 297 occupations in womenSome 12% of the Danish male workforce and 41% of the female workforce are at increased risk of Covid-19 infectionHOW THIS RESEARCH MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY?Preventive actions targeting the workplace may contribute substantially to alleviate disease occurrence in the ongoing Covid-19 and similar future pandemics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLaege Sofus Carl Emil Friis og Hustru Olga Doris Friis' Legat and Interreg Oresund-Kattegat-Skagerrak (AerendeID: NYPS 20303383)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Permissions to retrieve and analyse pseudonymized data through Statistics Denmark were obtained from the Knowledge Centre on Data Protection Compliance under the records of processing regarding health science research projects within the Capitol Region of Denmark (P-2020-897), Statistics Denmark (P-708121) and the National Board of Health Data (FSEID-00005368). Ethical approval is by Danish law not requested for studies that are entirely based on public registries. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe pseudonymized database used for the presented analyses is hosted by Statistics Denmark and is not publicly available. Permission to access the database can be granted by researchers at a research institution authorized by Statistics Denmark. On request the corresponding author can assist interested researchers to gain access.