@article {Wiens2022.10.05.22280736, author = {Kirsten E. Wiens and Hanmeng Xu and Kaiyue Zou and John Mwaba and Justin Lessler and Espoir B. Malembaka and Maya N. Demby and Godfrey Bwire and Firdausi Qadri and Elizabeth C. Lee and Andrew S. Azman}, title = {Towards estimating true cholera burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Vibrio cholerae positivity}, elocation-id = {2022.10.05.22280736}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1101/2022.10.05.22280736}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background Cholera surveillance relies on clinical diagnosis of acute watery diarrhea. Suspected cholera case definitions have high sensitivity but low specificity, challenging our ability to characterize cholera burden and epidemiology. Our objective was to estimate the proportion of clinically suspected cholera that are true Vibrio cholerae infections and identify factors that explain variation in positivity.Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies from 2000-2021 that tested >=10 suspected cholera cases for V. cholerae O1/O139 using culture, PCR and/or a rapid diagnostic test. We estimated diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity using a latent class meta-analysis. We estimated positivity using a random-effects meta-analysis, adjusting for test performance and study methodology.Results We included 113 studies from 28 countries. V. cholerae positivity was lower in studies with representative sampling and lower minimum ages in suspected case definitions. After adjusting for sampling methods, case definitions, and tests, on average half (49\%, 95\% Credible Interval: 43\%-54\%) of suspected cases represented true V. cholerae infections, although variation across studies was high. Odds of a suspected case having a true infection were 1.64 (95\% Credible Interval: 1.06-2.52) times higher when surveillance was initiated in response to an outbreak than in non-outbreak settings.Conclusions Burden estimates based on suspected cases alone may overestimate the incidence of medically attended cholera about twofold. However, accounting for cases missed by traditional clinical surveillance is key to unbiased overall cholera burden estimates. Given variability between settings, assumptions about positivity, which are necessary without exhaustive testing, should be based on local data.Key points By pooling results from 113 studies and adjusting for diagnostic tests and study methods, we find that approximately half of suspected cholera cases represent true Vibrio cholerae infections, though this fraction varies widely across epidemiological settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number OPP1171700] and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [grant number AI135115-01A1].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board and Temple University Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and available online at https://github.com/HopkinsIDD/cholera_positivity. https://github.com/HopkinsIDD/cholera_positivity}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/06/2022.10.05.22280736}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/06/2022.10.05.22280736.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }