PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Oyake, Kazuaki
AU  - Yamauchi, Katsuya
AU  - Inoue, Seigo
AU  - Sue, Keita
AU  - Ota, Hironobu
AU  - Ikuta, Junichi
AU  - Ema, Toshiki
AU  - Ochiai, Tomohiko
AU  - Hasui, Makoto
AU  - Hirata, Yuya
AU  - Hida, Ayaka
AU  - Yamamoto, Kenta
AU  - Kawai, Yoshihiro
AU  - Shiba, Kiyoto
AU  - Atsumi, Akihito
AU  - Nagafusa, Tetsuyuki
AU  - Tanaka, Satoshi
TI  - Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Motivational Factors in Rehabilitation
AID  - 10.1101/2022.09.30.22280550
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.09.30.22280550
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/30/2022.09.30.22280550.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/30/2022.09.30.22280550.full
AB  - Importance Patient motivation is an important determinant of rehabilitation outcomes. Differences in patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of motivational factors can potentially hinder patient-centered care.Objective To compare patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of the most important factors in motivating patients for rehabilitation.Design This multicenter descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to March 2022.Setting Thirteen hospitals with a convalescent rehabilitation ward.Participants Patients with neurological or orthopedic disorders undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and clinicians, including physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists, were selected purposively based on the inclusion criteria.Main Outcomes and Measures Patients and clinicians were asked to choose the most important factor from a list of potential motivational factors. The main outcome was patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of the relative importance of various motivational factors for rehabilitation.Results We obtained data from 479 patients and 401 clinicians. Response rates in the patient and clinician surveys were 92.1% and 62.2%, respectively. The most common primary reasons for patients’ hospitalizations were stroke (45.5%) and fracture (42.2%). Approximately half of the clinicians were physical therapists (49.9%). “Realization of recovery,” “goal setting,” and “practice related to the patient’s experience and lifestyle” were the three factors most frequently selected as most important by both patients and clinicians, chosen by 10.4%–26.5% of patients and 9.5%–36.7% of clinicians. Only five were rated as most important by 5% of clinicians; however, nine factors were selected by 5% of patients. Of these nine motivational factors, “medical information” (odds ratio: 5.19; 95% confidence interval: 2.24– 11.60) and “control of task difficulty” (odds ratio: 2.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.32–5.80) were selected by a significantly higher proportion of patients than clinicians.Conclusions and Relevance The three most frequently endorsed motivational factors were identical for patients and clinicians. The preferences of patients were more diverse than those of clinicians, and some motivational factors were preferred by patients over clinicians. Therefore, when determining motivational strategies, rehabilitation clinicians should consider individual patient preferences in addition to utilizing the core motivational factors supported by both parties.Question What are the similarities and differences between patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of the relative importance of factors motivating patients for rehabilitation?Findings In this multicenter descriptive cross-sectional survey of 479 patients and 401 clinicians, the three most endorsed motivational factors—realization of recovery goal setting, and practice related to the patient’s experience and lifestyle—were identical for patients and clinicians. However, patients had more diverse preferences for motivational factors than clinicians.Meaning In addition to utilizing the three core motivational factors, rehabilitation clinicians should consider individual patient preferences when determining which motivational strategies to use for enhancing patient-centered care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a JSPS KAKENHI grant to Satoshi Tanaka (JP20K21752).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.