PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Zhang, Yuzi
AU  - Chen, Jiandong
AU  - Ge, Lin
AU  - Williamson, John M.
AU  - Waller, Lance A.
AU  - Lyles, Robert H.
TI  - Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for Two-Stream Capture-Recapture Methods in Disease Surveillance
AID  - 10.1101/2022.09.21.22280224
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.09.21.22280224
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/23/2022.09.21.22280224.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/23/2022.09.21.22280224.full
AB  - Capture-recapture methods are widely applied in estimating the number (N) of prevalent or cumulatively incident cases in disease surveillance. Here, we focus the bulk of our attention on the common case in which there are two data streams. We propose a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis framework grounded in multinomial distribution-based maximum likelihood, hinging on a key dependence parameter that is typically non-identifiable but is epidemiologically interpretable. Focusing on the epidemiologically meaningful parameter unlocks appealing data visualizations for sensitivity analysis and provides an intuitively accessible framework for uncertainty analysis designed to leverage the practicing epidemiologist’s understanding of the implementation of the surveillance streams as the basis for assumptions driving estimation of N. By illustrating the proposed sensitivity analysis using publicly available HIV surveillance data, we emphasize both the need to admit the lack of information in the observed data and the appeal of incorporating expert opinion about the key dependence parameter. The proposed uncertainty analysis is an empirical Bayes-like approach designed to more realistically acknowledge variability in the estimated N associated with uncertainty in an expert’s opinion about the non-identifiable parameter, together with the statistical uncertainty. We demonstrate how such an approach can also facilitate an appealing general interval estimation procedure to accompany capture-recapture methods. Simulation studies illustrate the reliable performance of the proposed approach for quantifying uncertainties in estimating N in various contexts. Finally, we demonstrate how the recommended paradigm has the potential to be directly extended for application to data from more than two surveillance streams.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPartial support was provided by the National Institute of Health-funded Emory Center for AIDS Research (P30AI050409; Del Rio PI), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002378; Taylor PI) and by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Recurrence Information and Surveillance Program (CRISP) study (1 R01 CA208367- 01; Ward/Lash MPIs). The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data used in this paper are publicly available dataI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript