TY - JOUR T1 - Detecting changes in population trends in infection surveillance using community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence as an exemplar JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.09.14.22279931 SP - 2022.09.14.22279931 AU - Emma Pritchard AU - Karina-Doris Vihta AU - David W. Eyre AU - Susan Hopkins AU - Tim EA Peto AU - Philippa C. Matthews AU - Nicole Stoesser AU - Ruth Studley AU - Emma Rourke AU - Ian Diamond AU - Koen B. Pouwels AU - Ann Sarah Walker AU - the COVID-19 Infection Survey Team Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/15/2022.09.14.22279931.abstract N2 - Background Monitoring infection trends is vital to informing public health strategy. Detecting and quantifying changes in growth rates can inform policymakers’ rationale for implementing or continuing interventions aimed at reducing impact. Substantial changes in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence with emergence of variants provides opportunity to investigate different methods to do this.Methods We included PCR results from all participants in the UK’s COVID-19 Infection Survey between 1 August 2020-30 June 2022. Change-points for growth rates were identified using iterative sequential regression (ISR) and second derivatives of generalised additive models (GAMs).Consistency between methods and timeliness of detection were compared.Findings Of 8,799,079 visits, 147,278 (1·7%) were PCR-positive. Over the time period, change-points associated with emergence of major variants were estimated to occur a median 4 days earlier (IQR 0-8) in GAMs versus ISR, with only 2/48 change-points identified by only one method. Estimating recent change-points using successive data periods, four change-points (4/96) identified by GAMs were not found when adding later data or by ISR; 77% (74/96) of change-points identified by successive GAMs were identified by ISR. Change-points were detected 3-5 weeks after they occurred in both methods but could be detected earlier within specific subgroups.Interpretation Change-points in growth rates of SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in near real-time using ISR and second derivatives of GAMs. To increase certainty about changes in epidemic trajectories both methods could be run in parallel. Running either method in near real-time on different infection surveillance data streams could provide timely warnings of changing underlying epidemiology.Funding UK Health Security Agency, Department of Health and Social Care (UK), Welsh Government, Department of Health (on behalf of the Northern Ireland Government), Scottish Government, National Institute for Health Research.Competing Interest StatementDWE declares lecture fees from Gilead outside the submitted work. No other author has a conflict of interest to declareFunding StatementThis study is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care and the UK Health Security Agency with in-kind support from the Welsh Government, the Department of Health on behalf of the Northern Ireland Government and the Scottish Government. EP, K-DV, KBP, ASW, TEAP, NS, DWE are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) (NIHR200915). ASW and TEAP are also supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. KBP is also supported by the Huo Family Foundation. ASW is also supported by core support from the Medical Research Council UK to the MRC Clinical Trials Unit [MC_UU_12023/22] and is an NIHR Senior Investigator. PCM is funded by Wellcome (intermediate fellowship, grant ref 110110/Z/15/Z) and holds an NIHR Oxford BRC Senior Fellowship award. DWE is supported by a Robertson Fellowship and an NIHR Oxford BRC Senior Fellowship. NS is an Oxford Martin Fellow and an NIHR Oxford BRC Senior Fellow. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, NIHR, Department of Health, or PHE. The funder/sponsor did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors had full access to all data analysis outputs (reports and tables) and take responsibility for their integrity and accuracy. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study received ethical approval from the South Central Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee (20/SC/0195).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified study data are available for access by accredited researchers in the ONS Secure Research Service (SRS) for accredited research purposes under part 5, chapter 5 of the Digital Economy Act 2017. For further information about accreditation, contact research.Support{at}ons.gov.uk or visit the SRS website. ER -