RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Time trends between vaccination coverage and voting patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of COVID-19 and flu surveys in the United States
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.05.22279620
DO 10.1101/2022.09.05.22279620
A1 Minttu M Rönn
A1 Nicolas A Menzies
A1 Joshua A Salomon
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/09/2022.09.05.22279620.abstract
AB Background We assessed the relationship between vaccination coverage and voting patterns: how has the association between COVID-19 vaccination and voting patterns changed during the pandemic, how does it compare to the association between flu vaccination coverage and voting patterns, and what can the time trends between flu vaccination and voting patterns tell us about the broader relationship between vaccination coverage and voting patterns.Methods We analyzed survey data on flu and COVID-19 vaccination coverage utilizing National Immunization Surveys for flu (NIS-FLU; years 2010-2021) and for COVID (NIS-ACM; 2021-2022), CDC surveillance of COVID-19 vaccination coverage (2021-2022) and US COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey (CTIS; 2021-2022). We described the association between state-level COVID-19 and flu vaccination coverage and state-level voting patterns using Pearson correlation coefficient. We examined individual-level characteristics of people vaccinated for COVID-19 and for flu using logistic regression among responses in CTIS during April-June 2022. We analyzed flu vaccination coverage by age in NIS-FLU between 2010-2021, and its relationship with voting patterns to see whether there has been a departure from the secular pre-pandemic trend during the pandemic.Results Between May 2021 – June 2022 there was a strong and consistent correlation between state-level COVID-19 vaccination coverage and voting patterns for the Democratic party in the 2020 presidential elections. Pearson correlation coefficient was around 0.8 in NIS-ACM, CTIS and CDC surveillance with a range of 0.76–0.92. COVID-19 vaccination coverage in June 2022 was higher than flu vaccination coverage in all states and it had a stronger correlation with voting patterns (R=0.90 vs. R=0.60 in CTIS). There was a small reduction in the flu vaccination coverage between 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 flu seasons. In the individual-level logistic regression, vaccinated people were more likely to be living in a county where the majority voted for the Democratic candidate in 2020 elections both for COVID-19 (aOR .18, 95%CI 2.12-2.24) and for flu (aOR 1.38, 95%CI 1.36-1.41). We demonstrate a longstanding correlation between voting patterns and flu vaccination coverage. It varied by age with the strongest correlation in the youngest age groups. During the 2020-2021 flu season, all age groups, except for 5-12 years old, had a stronger correlation coefficient with voting patterns than in the previous years. However, the observed and predicted vaccination coverage show relatively modest differences in their correlation with vote share.Conclusions There are existing pre-pandemic patterns between vaccination coverage and voting patterns as demonstrated by the flu vaccination coverage for 2010-2021. During the pandemic COVID-19 vaccination has been more strongly correlated with vote share than the correlation observed for flu during and before the pandemic. The findings align with other research that has identified an association between adverse health outcomes and the political environment in the United States.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementJAS, NAM and MMR were support by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) grant number NU38OT000297-03 (to JAS). MMR was additionally supported by Harvard Data Science Initiative Trust in Science Exploratory Award (to MMR). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funders or the authors affiliated institutions. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The use of The US COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey (CTIS) for analysis of COVID-19 symptoms and related behaviors was exempt from review by Harvard Institutional Review Board (protocol number IRB20-0592). Other data used in the study are publicly available aggregate estimates.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWith the exception of CTIS microdata, the data are publicly available. Analytic code for the publicly available data are available in a GitHub repository.