PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kaufman, Harvey W
AU  - Meyer, William A
AU  - Clarke, Nigel J
AU  - Radcliff, Jeff
AU  - Rank, Christopher M
AU  - Freeman, James
AU  - Eisenberg, Marcia
AU  - Gillim, Laura
AU  - Morice, William G
AU  - Briscoe, David M
AU  - Perlin, David S
AU  - Wohlgemuth, Jay G
TI  - Assessing Vulnerability to COVID-19 in High-Risk Populations: The Role of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Targeted Serology
AID  - 10.1101/2022.08.22.22279079
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.08.22.22279079
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/23/2022.08.22.22279079.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/23/2022.08.22.22279079.full
AB  - Importance Individuals at increased risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19, due to compromised immunity or other risk factors, would benefit from objective measures of vulnerability to infection based on prior infection and/or vaccination. We reviewed published data to identify a specific role and interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 spike-targeted serology testing for such individuals. We also provide real-world evidence of spike-targeted antibody test results, identifying the seronegativity rate across the United States from March 2021 through June 2022. Analysis of antibody test results were compared between post-transplant (ie, immunocompromised) and all other patients tested in the first half of 2022. Finally, specific recommendations are provided for an evidence-based and clinically useful interpretation of spike-targeted serology to identify vulnerability to infection and potential subsequent adverse outcomes.Observations Decreased vaccine effectiveness among immunocompromised individuals is linked to correspondingly high rates of breakthrough infections. Evidence indicates that negative results on SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests are associated with increased risk for subsequent infection. Results from widely available, laboratory-based tests do not provide a direct measure of protection but appear to correlate well with the presence of surrogate pseudovirus-neutralizing antibodies. The results of SARS-CoV-2 semiquantitative tests have also been associated with vaccine effectiveness and the likelihood of breakthrough infection. The data suggest that “low-positive” results on semiquantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike-targeted antibody tests may help identify persons at increased relative risk for breakthrough infection leading to adverse outcomes. In an analysis of data from large national laboratories during the COVID-19 Omicron-related surge in 2022, results from SARS-CoV-2 spike-targeted antibody tests were negative in 16.6% (742/4459) of solid organ transplant recipients tested compared to only 11.0% (47,552/432,481) of the remaining tested population.Conclusions and Relevance Standardized semiquantitative and quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike-targeted antibody tests may provide objective information on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated adverse outcomes. This holds especially for high-risk populations, including transplant recipients, who demonstrate a relatively higher rate of seronegativity. The widespread availability of such tests presents an opportunity to refine risk assessment for individuals with suboptimal SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and to promote effective interventions. Interim federal guidance would support physicians and patients while additional investigations are pursued.Competing Interest StatementConflict of Interest Disclosures: Kaufman, Meyer, Clarke, Radcliff, and Wohlgemuth are employees of and own stock in Quest Diagnostics. Rank is an employee of and owns stock in Roche Diagnostics. Freeman is an employee of and owns stock in Siemens Healthineers. Eisenberg and Gillim are employees of LabCorp of and own stock in LabCorp. Morice is an employee of Mayo Medical Laboratories. Hackensack Meridian Health has licensed SARS-CoV-2 detection methodology (Perlin co-inventor) to T2 Diagnostics.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:wcg Institutional Review deemed this study to be exempt.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript