TY - JOUR T1 - Total Added Sugar Consumption is not Significantly Associated with Risk for Prediabetes Among U.S. adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2018 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.08.22.22279065 SP - 2022.08.22.22279065 AU - Nadia Markie Sneed AU - Andres Azuero AU - Jacqueline Moss AU - Amy M. Goss AU - Shannon A Morrison Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/23/2022.08.22.22279065.abstract N2 - Background Prediabetes affects 34.1% U.S. adults and is primarily linked to added sugars consumed from sugar-sweetened beverages. It is unclear if total dietary intake of added sugar also increases the risk for prediabetes.Objective This study examined if total (g/day) and percent intakes of <10%, 10-15%, or >15% added sugar increase the odds for prediabetes in U.S. adults.Design A cross-sectional, secondary analysis using 2013-2018 NHANES data was conducted.Participants/setting This study included data from U.S. adults ≥ 20 years with normoglycemia (N= 2,154) and prediabetes (N= 3,152) with 1-2 days of dietary recall information.Main outcome measures Prediabetes, defined as a Hemoglobin A1c of 5.7%-6.4% or a fasting plasma glucose of 100-125 mg/dL.Statistical analysis Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios of prediabetes based on usual intakes of added sugar (total and percent intakes) using the National Cancer Institute Method. Differences in prediabetes risk and total and percent intakes of added sugar were compared by race/ethnicity.Results The sample’s total energy intake from added sugar was 13.9%. Total (unadjusted: OR: 1.01, 95% CI: .99 - 1.00, p = .26; adjusted: OR: 1.00, 95% CI: .99 - 1.00, p = .91) and percent intakes of added sugar (unadjusted [<10%: (ref); 10-15%: OR: .93, 95% CI: .77 - 1.12, p = .44; >15%: OR: 1.03, 95% CI: .82 - 1.28, p = .82] and adjusted [<10%: (ref); 10 - 15%: OR: .82, 95% CI: .65 - 1.04, p = .09; >15%: OR: .96, 95% CI: .74 - 1.24, p = .73]) were not significantly associated with an increased odds of prediabetes. Prediabetes risk did not differ by race/ethnicity for total (unadjusted model [p = .65]; adjusted model [p = .51]) or percent (unadjusted model [p = .21]; adjusted model [p = .11]) added sugar intakes.Conclusions In adults ≥20 years with normoglycemia and prediabetes, total added sugar consumption did not significantly increase one’s risk for prediabetes and risk estimates did not differ by race/ethnicity. Experimental studies should expand upon this work to confirm these findings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was supported by grant number T32 HS026122 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. NMS also received doctoral funding through the University of Alabama Birmingham Graduate School and University of Alabama Birmingham School of Nursing Doctoral Scholarship.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data was used from 2013-2018 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. These data are publicly available for download at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htmI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ER -