TY - JOUR T1 - Neighbourhood deprivation across eight decades and late-life cognitive function in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: A life-course study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.08.16.22278836 SP - 2022.08.16.22278836 AU - Gergő Baranyi AU - Federica Conte AU - Ian J. Deary AU - Niamh Shortt AU - Catharine Ward Thompson AU - Simon R. Cox AU - Jamie Pearce Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/17/2022.08.16.22278836.abstract N2 - Introduction Although neighbourhood may predict late-life cognitive function, studies mostly relies on measurements at a single time point, with few investigations applying a life-course approach. Further, it is unclear whether the associations between neighbourhood and cognitive tests scores relate to specific cognitive domains or general ability. This study explored how neighbourhood deprivation across eight decades contributes to late-life cognitive function.Methods Data were drawn from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (n=1091) with cognitive function measured through 10 tests at ages 70, 73, 76, 79 and 82. Participants’ residential history was gathered with ‘lifegrid’ questionnaires and linked to neighbourhood deprivation in childhood, young adulthood, and mid-to-late adulthood. Associations were tested with latent growth curve models for levels and slopes of general (g) and domain-specific abilities (visuospatial ability, memory, and processing speed), life-course associations were explored with path analysis.Results Higher mid-to-late adulthood neighbourhood deprivation was associated with lower age 70 levels (β=-0.113, 95%CI: −0.205, −0.021) and faster decline of g over 12 years (β=-0.160, 95%CI: −0.290, −0.031). Initially-apparent findings with domain-specific cognitive functions (e.g. processing speed) were due to their shared variance with g. Path analyses suggested that childhood neighbourhood disadvantage is indirectly linked to late-life cognitive function through education and selective residential mobility.Conclusions To our knowledge, we provide the most comprehensive assessment of the relationship between life-course neighbourhood deprivation and cognitive ageing. Living in advantaged areas in mid-to-late adulthood may contribute to better cognitive function and slower decline, whereas advantaged childhood neighbourhood environment likely affects functioning through cognitive reserves.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK (ESRC; grant award ES/T003669/1). The LBC1936 study is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the ESRC (BB/W008793/1), Age UK (Disconnected Mind project), the US National Institutes of Health (R01AG054628, which supports IJD), and the University of Edinburgh. SRC was supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (221890/Z/20/Z).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The LBC1936 study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines with ethical permission obtained from the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland (MREC/01/0/56), Lothian Research Ethics Committee (wave 1, LREC/2003/2/29), and the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (waves 2-4, 07/MRE00/58). Written consent was obtained from all participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe LBCs study data have been the subject of many internal (within the University of Edinburgh) and external collaborations, which are encouraged. Those who have interests in outcomes other than cognitive domains are particularly encouraged to collaborate. Both LBC studies have clear data dictionaries which help researchers to discern whether the variables they wish to use are present; these provide a simple short title for each variable, alongside a longer, common-sense description/provenance of each variable. https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts ER -