TY - JOUR T1 - Brain imaging and neuropsychological assessment of individuals recovered from mild COVID-19 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.07.08.22277420 SP - 2022.07.08.22277420 AU - Marvin Petersen AU - Felix Leonard Nägele AU - Carola Mayer AU - Maximilian Schell AU - Elina Petersen AU - Simone Kühn AU - Jürgen Gallinat AU - Jens Fiehler AU - Ofer Pasternak AU - Jakob Matschke AU - Markus Glatzel AU - Raphael Twerenbold AU - Christian Gerloff AU - Götz Thomalla AU - Bastian Cheng Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/17/2022.07.08.22277420.abstract N2 - As SARS-CoV-2 infections have been shown to affect the central nervous system, the investigation of associated alterations of brain structure and neuropsychological sequelae is crucial to help address future health care needs. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessment of individuals recovered from a mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison with matched controls.Following a case-control design, 223 non-vaccinated individuals with a positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 obtained between 1 March and 31 December 2020 received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological assessments within the framework of the Hamburg City Health Study (median 9.7 months after testing). Two hundred twenty-three healthy controls, examined prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, were drawn from the main study and matched for age, sex, education and cardiovascular risk factors. Primary study outcomes were advanced diffusion MRI measures of white matter microstructure, cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensity load and neuropsychological test scores.The present analysis included 223 individuals recovered from mainly mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infections (100 female/123 male, age [years], mean ± SD, 55.54 ± 7.07) and 223 matched healthy controls (93 female/130 male, 55.74 ± 6.60). Among all 11 MR imaging markers tested, significant differences between groups were found in global measures of mean diffusivity and extracellular free-water which were both elevated in the white matter of post-SARS-CoV-2 individuals comparing to matched controls (free-water: 0.148 ± 0.018 vs. 0.142 ± 0.017, P<.001; mean diffusivity [10−3 mm2/s]: 0.747 ± 0.021 vs. 0.740 ± 0.020, P<.001). Classification accuracy for detecting post-SARS-CoV-2 individuals based on diffusion imaging markers was up to 80%. Neuropsychological test scores did not significantly differ between groups.Collectively, our findings suggest that subtle changes in white matter extracellular water content may last beyond the acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, in our sample, a mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with neuropsychological deficits, significant changes in cortical structure or vascular lesions several months after recovery. External validation of our findings and longitudinal follow-up investigations are needed.Competing Interest StatementJG has received speaker fees from Lundbeck, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Otsuka and Boehringer outside the submitted work. JF reported receiving personal fees from Acandis, Cerenovus, Microvention, Medtronic, Phenox, and Penumbra; receiving grants from Stryker and Route 92; being managing director of eppdata; and owning shares in Tegus and Vastrax; all outside the submitted work. GT has received fees as consultant or lecturer from Acandis, Alexion, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BristolMyersSquibb/Pfizer, Daichi Sankyo, Portola, and Stryker outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThis work was also funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation SFB 936, 178316478, C2 (M.P., F.L.N., C.M., G.T., B.C.) & C7 (J.G., S.K.). This publication has been approved by the Steering Board of the Hamburg City Health Study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The local ethics committee of the Landesaerztekammer Hamburg (State of Hamburg Chamber of Medical Practitioners, PV5131) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ER -