TY - JOUR T1 - Understanding the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on mitigation behaviors: A mixed methods approach using survey instruments and serious games JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.08.07.22278512 SP - 2022.08.07.22278512 AU - Scott C. Merrill AU - Sarah A. Nowak AU - Trisha R. Shrum AU - John P. Hanley AU - Eric M. Clark AU - Luke Fredrickson AU - Tung-Lin Liu AU - Robert M. Beattie AU - Aislinn O’Keefe AU - Asim Zia AU - Christopher J. Koliba Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/09/2022.08.07.22278512.abstract N2 - COVID-19 risk mitigation behavior, including social distancing and mask wearing, was a principal factor influencing the spread of COVID-19. Yet this behavior, and its association with COVID-19 perceptions and beliefs, is poorly understood. Here we used a mixed methods approach combining serious game data with survey instruments to describe relationships between perceptions and behavior. Using a series of survey questions, participants were described along a spectrum denoting their perception of their susceptibility to COVID-19 associated with a list of activities. Afterwards, participants engaged with a serious game to examine behavioral responses to scenarios involving shopping at a grocery store and going to a park during simulated pandemic conditions. Messages describing the simulated infection risk were shown to drive many behavioral decisions. Another significant correlate, derived from survey results, was the participant’s perception of susceptibility associated with various activities for acquiring the COVID-19 infection. Individuals that perceived every day activities, such as grocery shopping, as unlikely to lead to a COVID-19 infection spent more time near others in the game-simulated grocery store environment compared to those that consider such activities as risky. Additionally, we found that participant behavior became increasingly risky as time progresses if they were lucky enough not to experience an infection. This reflects behavior observed in the United States and more broadly, possibly explains how people update their perception of the risk of activities. Overall, results show a link between perception and action with regards to COVID-19 and support the use of targeted risk messaging to influence behavior. Moreover, the link between reported real-world perceptions and game behavior suggest that serious games can be used as valuable tools to test policies, risk messaging and communication, with the goal of nudging individuals with varied and nuanced perceptions and belief sets towards behaviors that will reduce the impact of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCJK, SCM, AZ, TS Internal grant from the University of Vermont's Gund Institute for Environment, Burlington, VT. USA (https://www.uvm.edu/gund). SAN, JPH Internal grant from the University of Vermont's Translational Global Infectious Diseases Research Center, Burlington, VT. USA (https://www.med.uvm.edu/tgircobre/home). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Vermont’s Institutional Review Board approved this research Approval number# STUDY00001027. Titled: COVID-19 Outbreak Behavior Experimental Simulation Game and Survey. Consent was obtained using online using computer, and was considered a type of written consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be held in a public repository and available after acceptance. ER -