RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Analysis of anti-Omicron neutralizing antibody titers in different convalescent plasma sources
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.24.21268317
DO 10.1101/2021.12.24.21268317
A1 Daniele Focosi
A1 Massimo Franchini
A1 Michael J. Joyner
A1 Arturo Casadevall
A1 David J Sullivan
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/05/2021.12.24.21268317.abstract
AB The latest SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron, with its immune escape from therapeutic anti-Spike monoclonal antibodies and vaccine-elicited sera, demonstrates the continued relevance of COVID19 convalescent plasma (CCP) therapies. Lessons learnt from previous usage of CCP suggests focusing on outpatients and immunocompromised recipients, with high neutralizing antibody (nAb) titer units. In this analysis we systematically reviewed Omicron neutralizing plasma activity data, and found that approximately 50% (426/911) of CCP from unvaccinated donors neutralizes Omicron with a very low geometric mean of geometric mean titers for 50% neutralization (GM(GMT50)) of about 17, representing a more than 24-fold reduction from paired WA-1 neutralization. Two doses of mRNA vaccines in nonconvalescent subjects had a similar 50% percent neutralization with Omicron neutralization GM(GMT(50)) about 24. However, CCP from vaccinees recovered from previous variants of concern or third-dose uninfected vaccinees was nearly 100% neutralizing with Omicron GM(GMT(50)) over 200, a 12-fold Omicron neutralizing antibody increase compared to unvaccinated convalescents from former VOCs. These findings have implications for both CCP stocks collected in prior pandemic periods and plans to restart CCP collections. Thus, CCP from vaccinated donors provides an effective tool to combat variants that defeat therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe analysis was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND), in collaboration with the Defense Health Agency (DHA) (contract number: W911QY2090012) (D.S), with additional support from Bloomberg Philanthropies, State of Maryland, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 3R01AI152078-01S1) (A.C).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv.