TY - JOUR T1 - Reproducibility Policies in Cardiology Journals: The REPLICA Cross-Sectional Study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.08.04.22278423 SP - 2022.08.04.22278423 AU - Lucas Helal AU - Filipe Ferrari AU - Danielle B Rice AU - Nadera Ahmadzai AU - Becky Skidmore AU - Daniel Umpierre AU - David Moher Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/04/2022.08.04.22278423.abstract N2 - Importance Transparency and data sharing are valuable practices in research, contributing to improved precision and flexibility in cumulative evidence; and ultimately expanding the research ecosystem by addressing one of the philosophical research norms that implies that knowledge belongs to society.Objectives The objective of the Reproducibility Policies In Cardiology Journals (REPLICA) study was to estimate the proportions of policies and guidance for reproducibility and transparency practices among Cardiology journals, as well as to determine details of completeness of reporting and data sharing conditions whenever disclosed.Design Cross-sectional analysis.Setting Cross-sectional study through analyses of journals deposited in the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Catalog tagged with the “Cardiology” and “Vascular Diseases” entry terms.Eligibility Criteria Cardiology journals from the NLM Catalog database that published at least one randomized clinical trial in 2018. Journals that published articles in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese and were available in MEDLINE/PubMed were eligible for inclusion.Exposures The exposures were mainly related to journal’s characteristics such as publisher operations characteristics (e.g., journal access only by subscription), indexation in the DOAJPlus, requirement for registration for RCTs, and others.Main outcomes and measures We prespecified a primary composite outcome composed of data-sharing policy or guidance. Secondary outcomes were proportions of reporting guidelines within the journal’s instructions for the author’s section (e.g., CONSORT), and also other components of sharing practices.Results We assessed 148 journals. Of them, 74 (50.0%, 95%CI 41.9% to 58.1%) presented policy or guidance for data sharing. We found guidance for data sharing in 68 journals (47.5% 95%CI 39.4% to 55.8%). Notably, among them, only two mentioned sharing individual participant data (IPD). Regarding guidelines for article reporting, we identified that 132 journals displayed guidance for authors, in which 27 (20.45%, 95%CI 14.34% to 28.29%) had CONSORT and EQUATOR Network guidance content.Conclusion and relevance In summary, we found a mild proportion of policies and guidance for data-sharing. Moreover, transparency practices inclined to RCTs are suboptimal, as mirrored by the very low prevalence of IPD data-sharing policy and guidance as well as specific reporting guidelines instructions for RCTs.Question What is the proportion of journals displaying policies and guidance about data sharing in cardiology journals?Findings We found a low prevalence of policy and guidance for data sharing in Cardiology journals, as well as transparency and reproducibility practices; details, individual participant data sharing, registration, and completeness of reporting, for example.Meaning Journals play a role in driving reproducibility and transparency among scientific areas. Stakeholders involved in the editorial processes should be open to understand the valuable impact of data-sharing practices and learn how to implement such mechanisms, that being the case.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/sgb6u/ Funding StatementLH is funded by the Diretoria de Pesquisa (Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) and was granted with a research fellowship from the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (Finance Code: 001, Graduate Program in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, under the number 88882.181760/2018-01) as well as FF (number: 88887.473530/2020-00). DBR is funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Vanier Graduate Scholarship. NA was supported by the Knowledge Synthesis Group (the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute). DM is supported by a University Research Chair.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is about editorial journal policies related to Cardiology journals at the NLM Catalog from PubMed/MEDLINE. Database can be found them and we just applied our eligibility criteria herein for that purpose.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAs stated above, this research project works under a data and materials sharing regimen. Moreover, the results will be presented to third parties, send in an aggregated data manner to all journal editors previously screened and forwarded to interested stakeholders for potential improvements (such as the ICMJE, COPE, WAME and others) as well as to community overall. ER -