PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Karen Bishop AU - Saliu Balogun AU - James Eynstone-Hinkins AU - Lauren Moran AU - Melonie Martin AU - Emily Banks AU - Chalapati Rao AU - Grace Joshy TI - Analysis of multiple causes of death: a review of methods and practices AID - 10.1101/2022.08.01.22278086 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.08.01.22278086 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.01.22278086.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.01.22278086.full AB - Background Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics - reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns - is recognised internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant multiple cause analytical methods and practices.Methods We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles included those analysing multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 articles; after screening, 434 full texts were reviewed.Results Most reviewed articles (77%, n=332) were published since 2001. The majority examined mortality by “any-mention” of a cause of death (87%, n=377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (56%, n=245). Recently emerging (since 2001) were applications of methods to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n=9), and the application of multiple cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n=5). Multiple cause methods applied to specific research objectives are described for recently emerging approaches.Conclusion This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview of methods and practices to date. Available multiple cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives, that with greater data availability and technology could be further developed and applied across a range of settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Project Grant (grant number 1163214) and was undertaken in collaboration with the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Emily Banks is supported by a Principal Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (reference number 1136128).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The review included publicly available original research articles; ethics approval is not relevant for the review. The review was supplemented by consultation with subject experts; ethics protocol was approved by the Australian National University Science and Medical Delegated Ethical Review Committee (Protocol number 2019/022).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe review included publicly available original research articles. All data produced in expert consultations are available upon reasonable request to the authors.