PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Natasha Clarke AU - Jennifer Ferrar AU - Emily Pechey AU - Minna Ventsel AU - Mark A Pilling AU - Marcus R Munafò AU - Theresa M Marteau AU - Gareth J Hollands TI - Impact of health warning labels and calorie labels on selection and purchasing of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks: a randomised controlled trial AID - 10.1101/2022.07.22.22277929 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.07.22.22277929 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.22.22277929.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.22.22277929.full AB - Objective Health warning and calorie labels on alcohol have the potential to reduce consumption at population level but remain unevaluated using robust designs with behavioural outcomes. The aim of the current study is to estimate the impact on selection and actual purchasing of (a) health warning labels (text-only and image-and-text) on alcoholic drinks and (b) calorie labels on alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.Design Parallel-groups randomised controlled trial.Setting Participants selected drinks in a simulated online supermarket, before purchasing them in an actual online supermarket.Participants Adults in England and Wales who regularly consumed and purchased beer or wine online (n= 644).Interventions Participants were randomised to one of six groups in a between-subjects 3 (Health warning labels (HWLs): i. image-and-text HWL, ii. text-only HWL, iii. no HWL) x 2 (Calorie labels: present vs absent) factorial design.Main outcome measures The number of alcohol units selected (with intention to purchase); secondary outcomes included alcohol units purchased and calories selected and purchased.Results 608 participants completed the study and were included in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of an overall difference for either (a) HWLs, or (b) calorie labels on the number of alcohol units selected [HWLs: F(2,599) = 0.406, p = .666; calorie labels: F(1,599) = 0.002, p = .961]. There was also no evidence of an overall difference on any secondary outcomes, including the number of alcohol units purchased [HWLs: F(2,462) = 1.85, p = .159; calorie labels: F(1,462) = 0.193, p = .661].In pre-specified subgroup analyses comparing the ‘calorie label only’ group (n = 101) to the ‘no label’ group (n = 104) there was no evidence that calorie labels reduced the number of calories selected [unadjusted means: 1913 calories vs 2203 calories, p = .643]. Amongst the 75% of participants who went on to purchase drinks, those in the ‘calorie label only’ group (n = 74) purchased fewer calories than those in the ‘no label’ group (n = 79) [unadjusted means: 1532 calories vs 2090, p = .028].Conclusion There was no evidence that health warning labels reduced the number of alcohol units selected or purchased in an online purchasing setting. There was some evidence suggesting that calorie labels on alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks may reduce calories purchased. Further evaluation is warranted in suitably powered studies in real world settings.Trial registration Pre-registered protocol (https://osf.io/ch2sm/) and prospective ISCRTN registration: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10313219Funding This study was funded by Wellcome [Grant number 206853/Z/17/Z].Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Trialhttps://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10313219Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/w5xf8/ Funding StatementWellcome [Grant number 206853/Z/17/Z].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Cambridge - Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (ref: PRE.2020.155).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available from the Open Science Framework (together with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, already uploaded) and the University of Cambridge Research Repository upon publication. https://osf.io/w5xf8/