@article {Feng2022.07.16.22277712, author = {Sarah Feng and Sydney McDaniel and Ann Van de Winckel}, title = {Finding Functionality: Rasch Analysis of the Functionality Appreciation Scale in community-dwelling adults including adults with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain in the US}, elocation-id = {2022.07.16.22277712}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1101/2022.07.16.22277712}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS) measures an individual{\textquoteright}s appreciation for the functions their body can perform, regardless of the individual{\textquoteright}s physical limitations. To facilitate the use of this tool by researchers and clinicians, it is necessary to understand what {\textquoteleft}normal{\textquoteright} scoring looks like in healthy adults, as well as validate the scoring of this scale. We analyzed the FAS using Rasch Measurement Theory. FAS responses, demographic data, and clinical questionnaires were collected by the Brain Body Mind Lab (University of Minnesota) from 567 community-dwelling adults recruited at the Minnesota State Fair, including 14 adults with spinal cord injury. We evaluated item and person fit, targeting, unidimensionality, person separation reliability (PSR), local item dependence (LID), and differential item functioning (DIF) for demographic and clinical characteristics. We found a significant ceiling effect (26.98\%) and a positive person mean location of 3.28{\textpm}2.10 logits, indicating the FAS is too easy for the community-dwelling adults in the US. PSR was 0.79, indicating a capacity to differentiate groups of people according to their ability level of functional appreciation. We also compared the person mean location of adults who did or did not participate in body awareness training. Adults who practiced body awareness training had a higher person mean location (4.28, Interquartile Range [IQR] = 3.96 logits) than those who did not (2.73, IQR = 3.34), indicating a higher functionality appreciation. Overall, FAS demonstrated good item and person fit, but the current version of FAS will require more difficult items to be added to improve the targeting of the scale for use in a general population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant UL1TR002494. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota approved the study (IRB$\#$ STUDY00005849), and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUpon acceptance of the paper, the data will be made available on the Dryad data repository (data link below) https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.66t1g1k4d}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/18/2022.07.16.22277712}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/18/2022.07.16.22277712.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }