TY - JOUR T1 - Low back pain care pathways and costs: association with the type of initial contact health care provider. A retrospective cohort study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.06.17.22276443 SP - 2022.06.17.22276443 AU - David Elton AU - Thomas M. Kosloff AU - Meng Zhang AU - Protima Advani AU - Yinglong Guo AU - Scott T. Shimotsu AU - Sean Sy AU - Ari Feuer Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/15/2022.06.17.22276443.abstract N2 - Background Low back pain (LBP) is prevalent, management benefits from high-quality clinical practice guidelines, and yet LBP is a common source of low value care. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between the type of initial contact health care provider (HCP), service utilization, and total episode cost for the management of LBP.Methods Episode of care was used to analyze a US national sample of LBP episodes completed in 2017-2019. A combined surgical and non-surgical (pooled) sample and a non-surgical sample were separately analyzed. The primary independent variable was the type of the initial contact HCP. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of 14 types of health care services and total episode cost. The association between initial contact HCP, total episode cost and rate of prescription opioid and NSAID use was tested using a mixed effects model.Results The study included 616,766 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older with 756,631 episodes of LBP involving 386,795 HCPs and incurring $1,010,495,291 in expenditures. A primary care or specialist HCP was initially contacted in 62.0% of episodes, with these episodes associated with early use of low-value services such as imaging, pharmacologic, and interventional services. A non-prescribing HCP was initially contacted in 32.5% of episodes with these episodes associated with early use of guideline recommended first line services. Each type of HCP emphasized different initial services with little indication of a stepped approach to managing LBP. Following adjustment for covariates chiropractors were associated with the lowest total episode cost. As an observational study of associations, numerous confounders may have impacted results.Conclusions An individual with LBP has different experiences based on the type of HCP initially contacted. Initial contact with primary care or specialist HCPs is associated with second- and third-line services provided before first line services, with little indication of a guideline recommended stepped approach to managing LBP. Increasing the likelihood of guideline-concordant, high-value care for LBP may require systemic changes to the health care delivery system. In the absence of red flags these changes may include increasing the proportion of individuals receiving early non-pharmacological treatment, either through improving direct access to non-prescribing HCPs or increasing timely referrals from primary care and specialist health care providers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Office of Human Research Affairs (OHRA), the ethics committee/IRB of UnitedHealth Group, determined this study was exempt from IRB review and waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsLBPLow back painUSUnited StatesCPGClinical practice guidelineDCDoctor of ChiropracticPTPhysical TherapistEMEmergency MedicineHCPHealth care providerLAcLicensed AcupuncturistADIArea Deprivation IndexSTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyETG®Episode Treatment Group®ERG®Episode Risk Group®ACPAmerican College of PhysiciansDODoctor of OsteopathyOTCOver the counterMICEMultiple imputation for chained equationsSDStandard deviationIQRInterquartile rangeOROdds ratioRRRisk ratioPAPhysician’s AssistantPCPPrimary care providerOSOrthopedic SurgeonNSNeurosurgeonPMRPhysical Medicine and RehabilitationPMPain ManagementUCUrgent CareNeuroNeurologistRheumRheumatologistCMTChiropractic manipulative treatmentOMTOsteopathic manipulative treatment ER -