RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring regression dilution bias using repeat measurements of 2858 variables in up to 49 000 UK Biobank participants
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.13.22277605
DO 10.1101/2022.07.13.22277605
A1 Rutter, Charlotte E
A1 Millard, Louise AC
A1 Borges, Maria Carolina
A1 Lawlor, Deborah A
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/15/2022.07.13.22277605.abstract
AB Background Measurement error in exposures and confounders can bias exposure-outcome associations but is rarely considered. Our aim was to assess measurement error between repeat measures of all continuous variables in UK Biobank, and explore approaches to mitigate its impact on exposure-outcome associations.Methods Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for all continuous variables with repeat measures. Regression calibration was used to correct for measurement error in both exposures and confounders, using the association of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) with mortality as an illustrative example.Results The 2858 continuous variables with repeat measures, varied in sample size from 109 to 49 121. They fell into three groups: (i) baseline visit measures (529 variables; median ICC=0.64, IQR= [0.57, 0.83]); (ii) online dietary measures (22 variables; median ICC=0.35, IQR=[0.30, 0.40]) and (iii) imaging measures (2307 variables; median ICC=0.85, IQR=[0.73, 0.94]). Highest ICC were for anthropometric and medical history measures, and lowest for dietary and heart magnetic resonance imaging.The ICC for CRP was 0.29 (95% CI=[0.27, 0.30]), and for body mass index and smoking pack-years (confounders), were 0.93 (95% CI=[0.92, 0.93]) and 0.85 (95% CI=[0.84, 0.86]) respectively. The association of CRP with all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.029 per mg/L, 95% CI=[1.028, 1.031]) increased when correction for RDB was applied to the exposure (HR=1.119, 95% CI=[1.095, 1.143]). Confounder correction did not influence estimates.Conclusions Measurement error varies widely and is often non-negligible. For UK Biobank we provide relevant statistics and adaptable code to help other researchers explore and correct for bias due to measurement error.Key MessagesRandom measurement error in the exposure and confounders can bias the association between exposure and outcome towards or away from the null.Some prospective studies, including UK Biobank, provide repeat measures of variables in a sub-sample for exploring bias due to random measurement error; these are rarely used.Our results demonstrate that measurement error is often non-negligible and may bias estimates.Agreement between repeated measures varies by category. In UK Biobank, dietary measures and heart magnetic resonance imaging are least stable while anthropometric and medical history variables are most stable.We have provided intraclass correlation coefficients for 2858 continuous variables from UK Biobank and adaptable code to support researchers to correct for bias due to random error in exposures and confounders.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council [grant numbers MR/N013638/1 PhD studentship to CER, MR/P014054/1 Skills Development Fellowship to MCB, MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_00011/6]; British Heart Foundation [CH/F/20/90003 Chair award to DAL, AA/18/7/34219]; National Institute of Health Research Senior Investigator Award [NF-0616-10102 to DAL]; and University of Bristol Vice-Chancellor Fellowships to LACM and MCB.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:UK Biobank received ethical approval from the UK National Health Service National Research Ethics Service [ref 11/NW/0382].I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript or supplement. Underlying data used is available by application to UK Biobank. Code used is available on GitHub. https://github.com/MRCIEU/measurement_error_adjustment