TY - JOUR T1 - PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging of <sup>90</sup>Y hepatic radioembolization at therapeutic and diagnostic activity levels: anthropomorphic phantom study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.07.07.22277361 SP - 2022.07.07.22277361 AU - A Budzyńska AU - A Kubik AU - K Kacperski AU - P Szubstarska AU - M Kuć AU - P Piasecki AU - M Konior AU - M Gryziński AU - M Dziuk AU - E Iller Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/10/2022.07.07.22277361.abstract N2 - Purpose Prior to 90Y radioembolization procedure a pretherapy simulation using 99mTc-MAA is performed. Alternatively, a small dosage of 90Y microspheres could be used. We aimed to assess the accuracy of lung shunt fraction (LSF) estimation in both high activity 90Y posttreatment and pretreatment scans with isotope activity of ∼100 MBq, using different imaging techniques. Additionally, we assessed the feasibility of visualising hot and cold hepatic tumours in PET/CT and Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT images.Materials and Methods Anthropomorphic phantom including liver (with two spherical tumours) and lung inserts was filled with 90Y chloride to simulate an LSF of 9.8%. The total initial activity in the liver was 1451 MBq, including 19.4 MBq in the hot sphere. Nine measurement sessions including PET/CT, SPECT/CT, and planar images were acquired at activities in the whole phantom ranging from 1618 MBq down to 43 MBq.The visibility of the tumours was appraised based on independent observers’ scores. Quantitatively, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for both spheres in all images.Results LSF estimation: For high activity in the phantom, PET reconstructions slightly underestimated the LSF; absolute difference was &lt;1.5pp (percent point). For activity &lt;100 MBq, the LSF was overestimated. Both SPECT and planar scintigraphy overestimated the LSF for all activities.Foci visibility: For SPECT/CT the cold tumour proved too small to be discernible (CNR &lt;0.5) regardless of the 90Y activity in the liver, while hot sphere was visible for activity &gt;200 MBq (CNR&gt;4). For PET/CT, the cold tumour was only visible with the highest 90Y activity (CNR&gt;4), whereas the hot one was seen for activity &gt;100 MBq (CNR&gt;5).Conclusions PET/CT may accurately estimate the LSF in a 90Y posttreatment procedure. However, at low activities of about 100 MBq it seems to provide unreliable estimations. PET imaging provided better visualisation of both hot and cold tumours.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementKK and PS received no specific funding for this work. All of the remaining authors were funded by project OPUS-13 no 2017/25/B/ST7/01745 funded by National Science Centre of Poland (https://www.ncn.gov.pl). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not Applicablell relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. ER -