TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of family history on penetrance of hereditary cancers in a population setting JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.07.08.22277415 SP - 2022.07.08.22277415 AU - L Jackson AU - MN Weedon AU - JW Harrison AU - AR Wood AU - KS Ruth AU - J Tyrrell AU - CF Wright Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/09/2022.07.08.22277415.abstract N2 - Background We sought to investigate how penetrance of familial cancer syndromes varies with family history using a population-based cohort.Methods We analysed 454,712 UK Biobank participants with exome sequence and clinical data. We identified participants with a self-reported family history of breast or colorectal cancer and a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in the major genes responsible for hereditary breast cancer or Lynch syndrome. We calculated survival to cancer diagnosis (controlled for age, sex, death, recruitment centre, screening and prophylactic surgery).Results Women with a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variant had an increased risk of breast cancer that was significantly higher in those with a first-degree family history (relative hazard 10.29 and 7.82, respectively) than those without (7.82 and 4.66). Penetrance to age 60 was also higher in those with a family history (44.7% and 24.1%) versus those without (22.8% and 17.9%). A similar pattern was seen in Lynch syndrome: individuals with a pathogenic MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 variant had an increased risk of bowel cancer that was significantly higher in those with a family history (relative hazard 63.7, 68.4 and 12.1) than those without (20.9, 18.6 and 5.9). Penetrance to age 60 was also higher for carriers of a pathogenic MLH1 or MSH2 variant in those with a family history (27.1% and 25.2%) versus those without (15.2% and 3.2%).Conclusions Individuals with pathogenic cancer syndrome variants are at significantly less elevated risk of cancer in the absence of family history (risk ratio 0.57), so invasive follow-up may be unwarranted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe current work is supported by the MRC (grant no MR/T00200X/1). The MRC had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 49847 UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) as a Research Tissue Bank (RTB) approval. This approval means that researchers do not require separate ethical clearance and can operate under the RTB approvalI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ER -