PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon AU - Sekhar, Praba AU - Besançon, Lonni AU - Turner, Tari AU - McDonald, Steve TI - The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical AID - 10.1101/2022.06.30.22277084 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.30.22277084 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/30/2022.06.30.22277084.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/30/2022.06.30.22277084.full AB - Background Retraction is the final safeguard against research error/misconduct. In principle, retraction exists to prevent serious issues identified in published research through post-publication review. Our study investigated the citing of clinical research papers retracted during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods We used the Retraction Watch database extracted as of 27/01/2022 to identify retracted COVID-19 papers and the Google Scholar citation function to gather a dataset of citations of retracted clinical research. We reviewed key aspects of the citing research.Results In total, the Retraction Watch database included 212 entries for retracted COVID-19 papers. Of these, 53 papers were clinical. There were a total of 1,141 citations of retracted papers, with 105 errors, leaving 1,036 citations to analyze. The majority (86%) of citations were not critical. The majority (80%) of papers citing retracted research were published after the retraction date.Conclusions The citation of retracted and withdrawn COVID-19 clinical studies is common, and rarely critical. Most researchers who cite retracted research do not identify that the paper is retracted, even when submitting long after the paper has been withdrawn. This has serious implications for the reliability of published research and the academic literature, which need to be addressed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was not funded.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData on retractions is available on request from Retraction Watch. Citations data is available on request from the corresponding author once retraction data has been shared by RW.