PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Xie, Min
AU  - Zhang, Xue-ling
AU  - Wu, Yue
AU  - Sun, Jia-huan
AU  - Yu, Wei
AU  - Cui, Pei-lin
TI  - Study on the Correlation Between Biliary Tract and Intestinal Flora and the Formation of Gallstones
AID  - 10.1101/2022.06.28.22277035
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.06.28.22277035
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/29/2022.06.28.22277035.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/29/2022.06.28.22277035.full
AB  - Objective In recent years, the incidence of gallstones and their complications has increased, bringing a heavy burden to patients, emphasizing the need to explore the pathogenesis of gallstones. Evidences suggest that the formation of gallstones is closely related to the biliary tract and the gut flora. This study aims to reveal the diversity and abundance of intestinal flora in patients with biliary stones, investigate the relationship between the structure of gallstone formation and its flora, and preliminarily research gene function annotation and metabolic pathways.Methods The subjects were 21 eligible gallstone patients undergoing surgery and 20 eligible gallstone-free patients admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from November 2019 to November 2020. Gallstones (GSS group), bile (GSZ group), gallbladder mucosa (GSN group), feces (GSF group) samples were collected from the gallstone group, as well as feces from the control group (HF group). High-throughput sequencing of the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was performed by the Illumina HiSeq platform, bioinformatics analysis was performed on the sequencing results.Results 1. The age, body mass index (BMI) and indirect bilirubin (IBil) of gallstone patients were higher than gallstone-free patients (P < 0.05). 2. A total of 23 427 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were identified in this study, with a mean ± standard deviation of 340±93, including 4 095 from gallstones (GSS group), 3 065 from bile (GSZ group), 4 687 from gallbladder mucosa (GSN group), and 5 203 from feces (GSF group). 6 377 OTUs were identified from the feces of the gallstone-free control group (HF group). 3. There was no significant difference in the diversity and phylum composition of intestinal flora between gallstone patients and the control group (P > 0.05); however, at the genus level, Achromobacter (P=0.010), Faecalibacterium (P=0.042), Lachnospira (P=0.011) were significantly reduced, while Enterococcus (P=0.001) was significantly increased. 4. The diversity and composition of biliary flora (stone, bile, mucosa) among patients with gallstones have no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The diversity and composition between the biliary and intestinal microflora in gallstones patients have statistical differences: (1) The diversity of biliary flora was significantly higher than the intestinal flora (Simpson index, P < 0.05). (2) At the phylum level, the abundance of Proteobacteria in the bile duct (stone, bile and mucosa) was significantly higher, while Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were significantly lower than in the intestinal tract (P < 0.05). (3) At the genus level, the abundance of Acinetobacter in the biliary tract was significantly higher, while Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Lachnoclostridium and Subdoligranulumbacteria were significantly lower than in the intestinal tract (P < 0.05). 5. The patient’s stone, bile and gallbladder mucosa shared more than 90% of OTUs. The shared OTUs of intestinal flora between gallstones patients and the control group was greater than 85%, while the five groups of samples shared more than 60% of OTUs. 6. LefSe showed that LDA > 4 in the biliary tract was Gammaproteobacteria, Pseudomonadales, Moraxellaceae, Acinetobacter, Betaproteobacteria, Burkholderiales and Prevotella that all belong to Proteobacteria.Conclusion The intestinal flora of patients with gallstones and without gallstones exhibited significant bacterial heterogeneity at the genus level. Compared with the intestinal flora of patients with gallstones, the biliary flora exhibited higher diversity. There were significant differences in the bacterial community structure at the phylum and genus levels. The biliary tract (stone, bile, mucosa) and intestinal flora of patients with gallstones have overlaps and differences, which provides the foothold for future studies on the biliary tract flora.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Digestive Medical Coordinated Development Center of Beijing Hospitals Authority (No. XXT14).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Clinical research design protocols;the institutional research ethics committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors