TY - JOUR T1 - The value of freedom: extending the evaluative space of capability JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.06.29.22277019 SP - 2022.06.29.22277019 AU - Jasper Ubels AU - Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte AU - Erica Niebauer AU - Michael Schlander Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/29/2022.06.29.22277019.abstract N2 - Introduction Developing an instrument with an ambiguous construct can be challenging. With the capability approach, this is argued to be case, since the concept of capability by Sen is ambiguous in respect to the burdens that people experience whilst achieving their capabilities. A potential solution is to develop instruments with a more comprehensive concept of capability, such as the concept ‘option-freedom’. The concept option-freedom stresses the importance of achieving capabilities without impediments. However, this concept has not been operationalized for wellbeing assessment. The aim of this study is to develop a theoretical framework of wellbeing with the concept option-freedom.Methods A best-fit framework synthesis was conducted with seven papers that report qualitative findings which underpin capability instruments. First, the a-priori concept option-freedom was used to deductively code against. New codes, subthemes and themes were developed inductively when data did not match the a-priori concept.Results Four themes emerged from the synthesis. (1) Option Wellbeing represents a range of options that need to be satisfied in order for individuals to experience wellbeing. (2) Self-Realization represents that there are experiences in an individual’s live that have value beyond realizing options. (3) Perceived Access to Options represents the perceived ability of individuals to realize freedoms. (4) Perceived Control represents the experience of having control.Conclusion Developing an instrument with the proposed framework has two benefits. First, it acknowledges the importance of assessing impediments in realizing capabilities for the assessment of wellbeing. Second, the themes form a broad informational base by including themes related to subjective wellbeing. The framework could be used as a broad base on which to assess the value of health technologies. Future research should study the feasibility of implementing the framework for the assessment of wellbeing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at the cited articles. ER -