PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Wright, Emily
AU  - Chen, Jarvis T.
AU  - Beckfield, Jason
AU  - Theodore, Nik
AU  - Krieger, Nancy
TI  - Workplace hazards and health among informally employed domestic workers in 14 cities, United States, 2011-2012: using four approaches to characterize workers’ patterns of exposures
AID  - 10.1101/2022.06.27.22275951
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.06.27.22275951
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/27/2022.06.27.22275951.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/27/2022.06.27.22275951.full
AB  - Objectives We characterized informally employed US domestic workers’ (DWers) exposure to patterns of workplace hazards, as well as singular hazards, and examined associations with DWers’ work-related and general health.Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from the sole nationwide survey of informally employed US DWers with work-related hazards data, conducted in 14 cities (2011-2012; N=2,086). We characterized DWers’ exposures using four approaches: single exposures (n=19 hazards), composite exposure to hazards selected a priori, classification trees, and latent class analysis. We used city fixed effects regression to estimate the risk ratio (RR) of work-related back injury, work-related illness, and fair-to-poor self-rated health associated with exposure as defined by each approach.Results Across all four approaches—net of individual, household, and occupational characteristics and city fixed effects—exposure to workplace hazards was associated with increased risk of the three health outcomes. For work-related back injury, the estimated RR associated with heavy lifting (the single hazard with the largest RR), exposure to all three hazards selected a priori (did heavy lifting, climbed to clean, worked long hours) versus none, exposure to the two hazards identified by classification trees (heavy lifting, verbally abused) versus “No heavy lifting,” and membership in the most-versus least-exposed latent class were, respectively, 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7 to 4.1); 6.5 (95% CI 4.8 to 8.7); 4.4 (95% CI 3.6 to 5.3), and 6.6 (95% CI 4.6 to 9.4).Conclusions Measures of joint work-related exposures were more strongly associated than single exposures with informally employed US DWers’ health profiles.What is already known on this topic Informally employed domestic workers in the US and internationally are frequently exposed to physical and social hazards at work, but only two studies have quantitatively assessed these workers’ exposures to joint patterns of hazards, and neither examined such patterns in relation to health.What this study adds We characterized informally employed US domestic workers’ exposure to 19 single hazards and to combinations of these hazards, using three distinct approaches: composite exposure to hazards selected a priori, classification trees, and latent class analysis. Across all approaches to defining exposure, domestic workers exposed to worse joint patterns of workplace hazards, as well as to certain single hazards, experienced greater risk of work-related back injury, work-related illness, and fair-to-poor self-rated health.How this study might affect research, practice, or policy Results underscore the importance of conceptualizing and operationalizing measures that capture domestic workers’ patterns of exposures. Moreover, results support the use of a latent class approach for identifying potential subgroups of workers unduly burdened and—across multiple health metrics—harmed by employer practices.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research reported in this article was not supported by any external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health determined this work was Not Human Subjects Research (IRB21-0855).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe 2011-2012 NDWA-UIC CUED survey data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly per the policies of NDWA to protect the privacy of individuals whose information was collected in these surveys. These terms of use are stipulated in the requirements of the authors' Data Use Agreement with the University of Illinois Chicago.