RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluating the Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability and Patient Adherence to Ophthalmology Appointments
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.22.22276771
DO 10.1101/2022.06.22.22276771
A1 Scanzera, Angelica C.
A1 Kravets, Sasha
A1 Hallak, Joelle A.
A1 Musick, Hugh
A1 Krishnan, Jerry A.
A1 Paul Chan, R.V.
A1 Kim, Sage J.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/23/2022.06.22.22276771.abstract
AB Objective Little is known about the association between neighborhood characteristics and non-adherence to attending scheduled ophthalmology appointments. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between neighborhood-level social vulnerability and adherence to scheduled ophthalmology appointments.Design Retrospective cohort study.Participants Adults aged 18 years and older with scheduled ophthalmology appointments between September 12, 2020, and February 8, 2021.Methods A single-center study was conducted at the University of Illinois Chicago Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, an urban tertiary care referral center in Chicago, Illinois. Primary exposure is neighborhood-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), based on the patient’s address of residence. The SVI ranks (possible range 0 to 1) each census tract on 15 social factors into four related themes (socioeconomic status, household composition & disability, minority status & language, and housing type & transportation). Higher SVI rankings indicate higher levels of social vulnerability. The overall SVI ranking and rankings for each of the four themes were analyzed separately as the primary exposure of interest in multivariable logistic regression models that controlled for age, sex, status (new or established appointment), race, and distance from clinic.Main Outcome Measure Non-adherence to attending scheduled ophthalmology appointments, defined as missing more than 25% of scheduled appointments.Results A total of 8,322 unique patients (41% non-Hispanic Black, 24% Hispanic, 22% non-Hispanic White) had scheduled appointments during the five-month study period (range 1 to 23 appointments). Of those, 28% of patients were non-adherent to appointments. In multivariable logistic regression models, non-adherence to appointments was associated with living in higher SVI ranking neighborhoods (socioeconomic status: (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) 2.38 [1.94, 2.91]; household composition/disability: 1.51 [1.26, 1.81]; minority status/language: 2.03 [1.55, 2.68]; housing type/transportation: 1.41 [1.16, 1.73]; and overall SVI: 2.46 [1.99, 3.06]).Conclusions Neighborhood-level measures of social vulnerability are associated with greater risk of non-adherence to scheduled ophthalmology appointments. Studies to better understand these neighborhood-level vulnerabilities are needed to inform the design and evaluation of multi-level (individual and neighborhood) strategies to reduce disparities in access to ophthalmology care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding by NIH/NEI K12 EY021475 (Scanzera), NIH/NEI EY001792, NIH/NIMHD U54MD012523 (Kim, Scanzera), and an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences from Research to Prevent Blindness. The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Illinois at Chicago Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsSVISocial Vulnerability IndexSDStandard DeviationIQRInter-Quartile Range