%0 Journal Article %A Thanaporn Kanchanawong %A Thitichaya Prasoetsang %A Faungfah Limvongvatana %A Ladarat Ooraikul %A Sukonta Kunapun %A Tiam Srikhamjak %A Patama Gomutbutra %T The Feasibility of the Thai Sensory Profile Assessment Tool (TSPA) for Classifying the participants for Mind-Body intervention %D 2022 %R 10.1101/2022.06.05.22275861 %J medRxiv %P 2022.06.05.22275861 %X Background The previous research found that multisensory interventions impact behavioral responses in healthy individuals and clinical populations, but few have been shown the impacts of Mind-Body intervention on cortisol levels in different sensory personalities. In Thailand, the earlier study found that the Thai Sensory Profile Assessment Tool (TSPA) had acceptable validity and reliability in classifying sensory personality called “sensory pattern”. The pattern is divided into sensory preference and sensory threshold, which is formulated from personal experience.Objective The main objective of this study is to examine the feasibility and interpretability of TSPA in classifying sensory patterns of participants attending Mind-Body Intervention consisting of Mindfulness-Based Flow Practice (MBFP) and Relax On-site program.Materials and methods There is a sub-study of a controlled cross-over trial study effect of a mindfulness intervention on anxiety and biomarkers in healthy nursing staff. For this study, we aim to categorize sensory patterns and find the feasibility of Mind-Body Intervention. Each participant was self-tested by TSPA before the intervention, either relaxation on-site or MBFP in the residential retreat program. The feasibility criteria include the time for finishing the test. The interpretability including participant’s comprehension and the classification phenotype provides insight into different effects of the intervention. The effect of MBFP and relaxation on-site was measured quantitatively by the change of morning cortisol before and after the intervention and qualitatively from satisfaction interviews after the intervention.Results The TSPA assessment takes an average time of 20 minutes. There is no complaint about the difficulty to understand participants. We classified participants by TSPA pattern into three groups by the sensory preference, including, 1) Balanced majority (14/20) have a moderate sensory preference and threshold, 2) low sensory preference for taste and smell (3/20), and 3) high sensory preference for sight smell and movement (3/20). At the same time, most participants show higher cortisol after relaxation on-site and decreased cortisol after MBFP.Conclusions This pilot study showed that TSPA can be a feasible tool for assessing the sensory preference of the participants to match the health promotion modalities appropriately. We also got a preliminary insight that people with low smell sensory preference, low smell sensory threshold, high sensory preference insight, and movement with moderate threshold showed differences in MBFP. However, it needs a larger sample, and a simpler questionnaire related to the MBFP intervention program to prove these initial findings.Competing Interest StatementTS is the inventor of MBFP and TSPA. However, no monetary incentives were received for the training and tools. No other authors have conflicts, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.Clinical TrialThis trial was registered on the Thailand clinical trial registry: TCTR20180313001 (https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org)Clinical Protocols https://www.cmc-ia.org/icm2018amsterdam/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/f31.pdf Funding StatementThis study received funding from the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. The grant number is Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University FUND-25620118-15666.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Faculty of Medicine of Chiang Mai university as a sub study under the project "The Cellular and Physiologic Mechanism of Mindfulness Based Flow Practice (MBFP) therapy for Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms. An Exploratory Clinical Trial" by the Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai university Institutional Review Board (IRB) the Chiang Mai Medical School Ethical committee (study code: FAM-2561-05432)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/06/21/2022.06.05.22275861.full.pdf