PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Anna R Gagliardi
AU  - Rob HC Chen
AU  - Himani Boury
AU  - Mathieu Albert
AU  - James Chow
AU  - Ralph S DaCosta
AU  - Michael Hoffman
AU  - Behrang Keshavarz
AU  - Pia Kontos
AU  - Jenny Liu
AU  - Mary Pat McAndrews
AU  - Stephanie Protze
TI  - DORA-compliant measures to assess research quality and impact in biomedical institutions: review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey
AID  - 10.1101/2022.06.16.22276440
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.06.16.22276440
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/17/2022.06.16.22276440.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/17/2022.06.16.22276440.full
AB  - Objective The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) advocates for assessing biomedical research quality and impact, yet academic organizations continue to employ traditional measures such as Journal Impact Factor. We aimed to identify and prioritize measures for assessing research quality and impact.Methods We conducted a review of published and grey literature to identify measures of research quality and impact, which we included in an online survey. We assembled a panel of researchers and research leaders, and conducted a two-round Delphi survey to prioritize measures rated as high (rated 6 or 7 by ≥ 80% of respondents) or moderate (rated 6 or 7 by ≥ 50% of respondents) importance.Results We identified 50 measures organized in 8 domains: relevance of the research program, challenges to research program, or productivity, team/open science, funding, innovations, publications, other dissemination, and impact. Rating of measures by 44 panelists (60%) in Round One and 24 (55%) in Round Two of a Delphi survey resulted in consensus on the high importance of 5 measures: research advances existing knowledge, research plan is innovative, an independent body of research (or fundamental role) supported by peer-reviewed research funding, research outputs relevant to discipline, and quality of the content of publications. Five measures achieved consensus on moderate importance: challenges to research productivity, potential to improve health or healthcare, team science, collaboration, and recognition by professional societies or academic bodies. There was high congruence between researchers and research leaders across disciplines.Conclusions Our work contributes to the field by identifying 10 DORA-compliant measures of research quality and impact, a more comprehensive and explicit set of measures than prior efforts. Research is needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers of use of DORA-compliant measures, and to “de-implement” traditional measures that do not uphold DORA principles yet are still in use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this workAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University Health Network Research Ethics Board waived the need for ethical review and approval of this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files