PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - José A. Castro-Rodriguez AU - Eleanor N. Fish AU - Tobi Kollmann AU - Carolina Iturriaga AU - Yuliya Karpievitch AU - Casey Shannon AU - Virginia Chen AU - Robert Balshaw AU - Samuel Montgomery AU - Joseph Ho AU - Rym Ben Othman AU - Radhouana Aniba AU - Francisca Gidi-Yunge AU - Lucy Hartnell AU - Guillermo Pérez-Mateluna AU - Marcela Urzúa AU - Scott Tebbutt AU - Diego García-Huidobro AU - Cecilia Perret AU - Arturo Borzutzky AU - Stephen M. Stick TI - Interferon Beta-1α ring prophylaxis to reduce household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 AID - 10.1101/2022.06.13.22276369 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.13.22276369 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/14/2022.06.13.22276369.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/14/2022.06.13.22276369.full AB - Background Evidence suggests that early, robust type 1 interferon responses to SARS-CoV-2 are critical determinants for COVID-19 disease outcomes, accelerating viral clearance and limiting viral shedding. Accordingly, we undertook a ring prophylaxis study to determine whether pegylated IFNß-1α could reduce SARS-CoV-2 household transmission.Methods A household cluster randomized controlled study of IFNß-1α administered to non-hospitalized, symptomatic COVID-19 index cases and treatment-eligible household contacts aged 18-70 years compared to standard care, was conducted. Following randomization participants received IFNß-1α on days 1, 6, and 11 or standard care. Viral shedding was determined by sequential salivary polymerase chain reaction measurements until day 29 in both study arms. A post-hoc ‘at risk population’ was defined as households where the index case was positive at the start of the study and there was at least one treatment eligible contact in a household who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses were undertaken to determine the effects of treatment on (i) reducing viral shedding in index cases and (ii) reducing viral transmission to post-exposure household contacts.Results In total, 1172 participants in 341 households underwent randomization, with 607 assigned to receive IFNß-1α and 565 to standard care. Based on intention to treat and per protocol analyses, IFNß-1α treatment was ineffective. However, in the ‘at risk’ population, the relative risk of infection was reduced by 23% in treated individuals and that there was a 95% probability that IFNß-1α reduced household transmission.Conclusion Ring prophylaxis with IFNß-1α reduces the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within a household.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04552379Clinical Protocols https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34388972/ Funding StatementThis study was funded by: BHP Holdings Pty Ltd BiogenAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Ethics approval grantedI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors