TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing the completeness of reporting of exercise-based interventions in cardiovascular trials JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.06.06.22276052 SP - 2022.06.06.22276052 AU - GW Freccia AU - RZ Santos AU - L Lucca AU - AS Korbes AU - T Carvalho Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/07/2022.06.06.22276052.abstract N2 - Study Objective In cardiology, the reporting of interventions is insufficiently detailed to elicit replication. Specifically for cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR) trials, the quality of the description of its exercise-based interventions (EBI) is poorly known. Our primary objective is to estimate the adherence of EBI of CVR trials to TIDieR reporting guideline. Secondarily, we tested whether the CVR setting would be associated with a better reporting, also exploring whether transparency and methodological characteristics could be related.Design and Setting This cross-sectional study analysed 96 trials with EBI published within CVR literature. For our primary objective, TIDieR reporting guideline was accounted as a reference to assess overall adherence of eligible RCTs. For our secondary objectives we used generalised estimating equations to point out (a) if intervention setting (eg, home-based vs. centre-based) was associated with intervention reporting, and (b) if trials transparency and methodological characteristics would be associated with intervention reporting.Results On average, arms adequately reported 4.8/12 (SD=2.4) TIDieR items. 65.07% of our EBI arms failed to adequately report ≥ 6 TIDieR items. Three of 146 (2.05%) arms adhered to all 12 TIDieR items. Additionally, intervention setting was not associated with a better description.Conclusions We concluded that EBIs in CVR lack to report fundamental aspects of the interventions to be replicated by third parties based on their reports.HighlightsWe found an inadequate and insufficient exercise-based interventions reporting of cardiovascular rehabilitation trials.Overall, about 40% of TIDieR reporting guideline adherence was found, with most interventions reporting its items improperly.Exercise-based intervention care setting (home- and centre-based) have no association with a better intervention description.Studies with 2 or more EBI arms are associated with a poor TIDieR adherence.Publishers and Editorial committees may guide cardiology journals for a better intervention reporting.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://osf.io/754ht/https://osf.io/754ht/. ER -