PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alicia J. Peel
AU  - Olakunle Oginni
AU  - Elham Assary
AU  - Georgina Krebs
AU  - Celestine Lockhart
AU  - Thomas McGregor
AU  - Elisavet Palaiologou
AU  - Angelia Ronald
AU  - Andrea Danese
AU  - Thalia C. Eley
TI  - A multivariate genetic analysis of environmental sensitivity, anxiety sensitivity and reported life events in adolescents
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.24.22275523
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.24.22275523
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/06/2022.05.24.22275523.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/06/2022.05.24.22275523.full
AB  - Background Despite being considered a measure of environmental risk, reported life events are partly heritable. One mechanism that may contribute to their heritability is genetic influences on sensitivity. These sensitivity biases can relate to how individuals process the contextual aspects of their environment (environmental sensitivity) or how they interpret their own physical and emotional responses (anxiety sensitivity). The aim of this study was to explore the genetic and environmental overlap between self-reported life events and measures of sensitivity.Methods At age 17, individuals (N = 2,939) from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) completed measures of environmental sensitivity (Highly Sensitive Child Scale) and anxiety sensitivity (Children’s Anxiety Sensitivity Index), as well as reporting on their experience of 20 recent life events. Using multivariate Cholesky decomposition models, we investigated the shared genetic and environmental influences on the associations between these measures of sensitivity and the number of reported life events, as well as both negative and positive ratings of life events.Results The majority of the associations between anxiety sensitivity, environmental sensitivity and reported life events were explained by shared genetic influences (59%-75%), with the remainder explained by non-shared environmental influences (25%-41%). Environmental sensitivity showed comparable genetic correlations with both negative and positive ratings of life events (rA = .21 and .15), anxiety sensitivity only showed a significant genetic correlation with negative ratings of life events (rA = .33). Approximately 10% of the genetic influences on reported life events were accounted for by genetic influences shared with anxiety sensitivity and environmental sensitivity.Conclusions A proportion of the heritable component of reported life events is captured by measures of sensitivity. Differences in how individuals process the contextual aspects of the environment or interpret their own physical and emotional response to environmental stimuli may be one mechanism through which genetic liability influences the subjective experience of life events.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe TEDS Study has been funded by 6 consecutive programme grants from the MRC, the most recent of which is MR/V012878/1 to T.C. Eley (previously MR/M021475/1, G0901245, G0500079, and G9424799). This study presents independent research part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. A.J Peel and E. Palaiologou are supported by UK Economics and Social Research Council studentships. A. Danese is part funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. A. Ronald is supported by a UK Medical Research Council grant G1100559.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethics Committee of Kings College London gave ethical approval for the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study came from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS). Eligible researchers can apply for access to the TEDS data at https://www.teds.ac.uk/researchers/teds-data-access-policy. https://osf.io/haud4/