PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Louise E. Smith AU - Susan M. Sherman AU - Julius Sim AU - Richard Amlôt AU - Megan Cutts AU - Hannah Dasch AU - Nick Sevdalis AU - G James Rubin TI - Parents’ intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 3) AID - 10.1101/2022.05.20.22275350 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.05.20.22275350 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/20/2022.05.20.22275350.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/20/2022.05.20.22275350.full AB - Objectives To investigate UK parents’ vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children.Study design Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study.Methods Online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15- year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention. Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis.Results Parental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns.Conclusions Parent COVID-19 vaccination and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for one’s child. How fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UK’s reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19 may impact parents’ intention to vaccinate their child requires further study.Competing Interest StatementNS is the director of the London Safety and Training Solutions Ltd, which offers training in patient safety, implementation solutions and human factors to healthcare organizations and the pharmaceutical industry. At the time of writing GJR is acting as an expert witness in an unrelated case involving Bayer PLC, supported by LS. LS, RA and GJR were members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies or its subgroups. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Funding StatementData collection was funded by a Keele University Faculty of Natural Sciences Research Development award to SMS, JS and NS, and a King's COVID Appeal Fund award granted jointly to LS, GJR, RA, NS, SMS and JS. NS research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King's Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is funded by King's Health Partners (Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), and the Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, UK Health Security Agency or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained ethical approval for this study from Keele University's Research Ethics Committee (reference: PS-200129).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available online at https://osf.io/tehg8/