PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sjoerd van Alten
AU  - Benjamin W. Domingue
AU  - Titus Galama
AU  - Andries T. Marees
TI  - Reweighting the UK Biobank to reflect its underlying sampling population substantially reduces pervasive selection bias due to volunteering
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.16.22275048
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.16.22275048
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/16/2022.05.16.22275048.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/16/2022.05.16.22275048.full
AB  - The UK Biobank (UKB) is a large cohort study of considerable empirical importance to fields such as medicine, epidemiology, statistical genetics, and the social sciences, due to its very large size (∼ 500,000 individuals) and its wide availability of variables. However, the UKB is not representative of its underlying sampling population. Selection bias due to volunteering (volunteer bias) is a known source of confounding. Individuals entering the UKB are more likely to be older, to be female, and of higher socioeconomic status. Using representative microdata from the UK Census as a reference, we document significant bias in estimated associations due to non-random selection into the UKB. For some associations, volunteer bias in the UKB is so severe that estimates have the opposite sign. E.g., older individuals in the UKB tend to be in better health. To aid researchers in correcting for volunteer bias in the UKB, we construct inverse probability weights based on UK census microdata. The use of these weights in weighted regressions reduces 78% of volunteer bias on average. Our inverse probability weights will be made available.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health (RF1055654 and R56AG058726), the Dutch National Science Foundation (016.VIDI.185.044), and the Jacobs Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe present study uses UK Census safeguarded microdata and UK Biobank data. UK Census safeguarded microdata data and UKB data can be accessed upon request for research projects that have obtained necessary approval. These requests can be submitted through https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/ and https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ respectively. https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/