RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Artificial intelligence enabled retinal vasculometry for prediction of circulatory mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.16.22275133
DO 10.1101/2022.05.16.22275133
A1 Alicja R Rudnicka
A1 Roshan A Welikala
A1 Sarah A Barman
A1 Paul J Foster
A1 Robert Luben
A1 Shabina A Hayat
A1 Kay-Tee Khaw
A1 Peter H Whincup
A1 David P Strachan
A1 Christopher G Owen
A1 the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/16/2022.05.16.22275133.abstract
AB Aims We examine whether inclusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal vasculometry (RV) improves existing risk algorithms for incident stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and circulatory mortality.Methods AI-enabled retinal vessel image analysis processed images from 88,052 UK Biobank (UKB) participants (aged 40-69 years at image capture) and 7,411 EPIC-Norfolk participants (aged 48-92). Retinal arteriolar and venular width, tortuosity and area were extracted. Prediction models were developed in UKB using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for circulatory mortality, incident stroke and MI, and externally validated in EPIC-Norfolk. Model performance was assessed using optimism adjusted calibration, C- and R2 statistics. Performance of Framingham risk scores (FRS) for incident stroke and incident MI, with addition of RV to FRS, were compared with a simpler model based on RV, age, smoking status and medical history (antihypertensive/cholesterol lowering medication, diabetes, prevalent stroke/MI).Results UKB prognostic models were developed on 65,144 participants (mean age 56.8; median follow-up 7.7 years) and validated in 5,862 EPIC-Norfolk participants (67.6, 9.1 years respectively). Prediction models for circulatory mortality in men and women had optimism adjusted C- and R2 statistics between 0.75-0.77 and 0.33-0.44 respectively. For incident stroke and MI, addition of RV to FRS did not improve model performance in either cohort. However, the simpler RV model performed equally or better than FRS.Conclusion RV offers an alternative predictive biomarker to traditional risk-scores for vascular health, without the need for blood sampling or blood pressure measurement. Further work is needed to examine RV in population screening to triage individuals at high-risk. (250 words)What is already known on this topicPopulation screening for MI and stroke using risk prediction tools exist but have limited uptake; risk scores for circulator mortality do not exist.What this study addsRisk models developed in UK Biobank (validated in EPIC-Norfolk) using Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal vasculometry (RV), age, history of cardiovascular disease, use of hypertensive medication and smoking yielded high predictive test performance for circulatory mortality.Risk scores for MI and stroke performed similarly to established risk scores.How this study might affect research, practice or policyAI-enabled RV extraction offers a non-invasive prognostic biomarker of vascular health that does not require blood sampling or blood pressure measurement, and potentially has greater community reach to identify individuals at medium-high risk requiring further clinical assessment.SYNOPSIS/PRECIS Risk models developed in UK Biobank (validated in EPIC-Norfolk) using Artificial Intelligence enabled retinal vasculometry indices, age, history of cardiovascular disease, use of hypertensive medication and smoking yielded high predictive test performance for circulatory mortality. Risk scores for MI and stroke performed similarly to established risk scores.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe retinal vasculometry work was supported by the Medical Research Council Population and Systems Medicine Board (MR/L02005X/1) and British Heart Foundation (PG/15/101/31889). Prof Foster has received additional support from the Richard Desmond Charitable Trust (via Fight for Sight) and the Department for Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department for Health. EPIC-Norfolk funding: Medical Research Council, UK (MRC) http://www.mrc.ac.uk/ (Ref: MR/N003284/1) Cancer Research UK http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/ (CRUK, Ref: C864/A8257). The clinic for EPIC-Norfolk 3HC was funded by Research into Aging, now known as Age UK http://www.ageuk.org.uk/ (Grant Ref: 262).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UK Biobank study was approved by the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (11/NW/03820). The EPIC-Norfolk study was approved by the Norfolk Local Research Ethics Committee (05/Q0101/191) and East Norfolk and Waveney NHS Research Governance Committee (2005EC07L). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data reported in this article are available via application to the UK Biobank to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure.