TY - JOUR T1 - Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.05.09.22274680 SP - 2022.05.09.22274680 AU - Emily Getzen AU - Lyle Ungar AU - Danielle Mowery AU - Xiaoqian Jiang AU - Qi Long Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/10/2022.05.09.22274680.abstract N2 - Electronic health records (EHRs) are collected as a routine part of healthcare delivery, and have great potential to be utilized to improve patient health outcomes. They contain multiple years of health information to be leveraged for risk prediction, disease detection, and treatment evaluation. However, they do not have standardized formatting, and can present significant analytical challenges– they contain multi-scale data from heterogeneous domains and include both structured and unstructured data. Data for individual patients are collected at irregular time intervals and with varying frequencies. In addition to the analytical challenges, EHRs can reflect inequity– patients belonging to different groups will have differing amounts of data in their health records. Many of these issues can contribute to biased data collection. The consequence is that the data for marginalized groups may be less informative due to more fragmented care, which can be viewed as a type of missing data problem. For EHRs data in this complex form, there is currently no framework for introducing missing values. There has also been little to no work in assessing the impact of missing data in EHRs. In this work, we simulate realistic missing data scenarios in EHRs to adequately assess their impact on predictive modeling. We incorporate the use of a medical knowledge graph to capture dependencies between medical events to create a more realistic missing data framework. In an intensive care unit setting, we found that missing data have greater negative impact on the performance of disease prediction models in groups that tend to have less access to healthcare, or seek less healthcare. We also found that the impact of missing data on disease prediction models is stronger when using the knowledge graph framework to introduce realistic missing values as opposed to random event removal.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is partly supported by NIH grant R01-GM124111. The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study involves only openly available medical data, which can be obtained from: https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii-demo/1.4/I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii-demo/1.4/ ER -