PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Joseph A. Lewnard
AU  - Vennis X. Hong
AU  - Manish M. Patel
AU  - Rebecca Kahn
AU  - Marc Lipsitch
AU  - Sara Y. Tartof
TI  - Clinical outcomes associated with Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and BA.1/BA.1.1 or BA.2 subvariant infection in southern California
AID  - 10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.01.11.22269045
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/10/2022.01.11.22269045.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/10/2022.01.11.22269045.full
AB  - The Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 rapidly achieved global dissemination following its emergence in southern Africa in November, 2021.1,2 Epidemiologic surveillance has revealed changes in COVID-19 case-to-hospitalization and case-to-mortality ratios following Omicron variant emergence,3–6 although interpretation of these changes presents challenges due to differential protection against Omicron or Delta (B.1.617.2) variant SARS-CoV-2 infections associated with prior vaccine-derived and naturally-acquired immunity, as well as longer-term changes in testing and healthcare practices.7 Here we report clinical outcomes among 222,688 cases with Omicron variant infections and 23,305 time-matched cases with Delta variant infections within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system, who were followed longitudinally following positive outpatient tests between 15 December, 2021 and 17 January, 2022, when Omicron cases were almost exclusively BA.1 or its sublineages. Adjusted hazard ratios of progression to any hospital admission, symptomatic hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and death were 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.69), 0.59 (0.51-0.68), 0.50 (0.29-0.87), 0.36 (0.18-0.72), and 0.21 (0.10-0.44) respectively, for cases with Omicron versus Delta variant infections. In contrast, among 14,661 Omicron cases ascertained by outpatient testing between 3 February and 17 March, 2022, infection with the BA.2 or BA.1/BA.1.1 subvariants did not show evidence of differential risk of severe outcomes. Lower risk of severe clinical outcomes among cases with Omicron variant infection merits consideration in planning of healthcare capacity needs amid establishment of the Omicron variant as the dominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineage globally, and should inform the interpretation of both case- and hospital-based surveillance data.Competing Interest StatementJAL discloses receipt of grants from Pfizer and Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and VaxCyte, Inc., unrelated to this work. SYT discloses receipt of grants from Pfizer unrelated to this work. ML reports grants from CDC, grants from NIH, grants from UK NIHR, grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Peter Diamandis/Abundance Platinum, outside the submitted work; and Unpaid advice to One Day Sooner, Pfizer, Janssen, Astra-Zeneca, Covaxx (United Biomedical). VXH, MMP, and RK have no competing interests to disclose.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board, which waived requirement for informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRequests for access to data should be submitted to Sara.Y.Tartof{at}kp.org.