RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Logistic regression with machine learning sheds light on the problematic sexual behavior phenotype JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2022.01.31.21267382 DO 10.1101/2022.01.31.21267382 A1 Shui Jiang A1 Keanna Wallace A1 Esther Yang A1 Leslie Roper A1 Garima Aryal A1 Dawon Lee A1 Rohit J Lodhi A1 Rick Isenberg A1 Bradley Green A1 David Wishart A1 Katherine J Aitchison YR 2022 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/02/2022.01.31.21267382.abstract AB Objectives There has been a longstanding debate about whether the mechanisms involved in problematic sexual behavior (PSB) are similar to those observed in addictive disorders, or related to impulse control or to compulsivity. The aim of this report was to contribute to this debate by investigating the association between PSB, addictive disorders (internet addiction, compulsive buying), measures associated with the construct known as reward deficiency (RDS), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in young adults in post-secondary education.Methods A Canadian university Office of the Registrar invited 68,846 eligible students and postdoctoral fellows. Out of 4710 expressing interest in participating, 3359 completed on-line questionnaires, and 1801 completed the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). PSB was measured by combining those screening positive (≥6) on the Sexual Addiction Screening Test-Revised (SAST-R) Core with those self-reporting PSB. Current mental health condition(s) and childhood trauma were measured by self-report. OCD was assessed by a combination of self-report and MINI data.Results 12.18% (407/3341) of participants screened positive on the SAST-R Core. On logistic regression, OCD, attention deficit, internet addiction, a family history of PSB, childhood trauma, compulsive buying and male gender were associated with PSB. On multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), OCD appeared to cluster separately from the other measures, and the pattern of data differed by gender.Conclusions Factors that have previously been associated with RDS and OCD are both associated with increased odds of PSB. The factors associated with RDS appear to contribute to a separate data cluster from OCD, and to lie closer to PSB.Competing Interest StatementDr. Carnes has a conflict of interest with the American Foundation for Addiction Research, and for this reason, he is not an author on the paper. Dr. Aitchison has received two research grants from Janssen Inc., Canada (fellowship grants for trainees). The analysis and data interpretation were conducted independently.Funding StatementThe study was funded by an Alberta Centennial Addiction and Mental Health Research Chair and translational funding (to KJA), and by the American Foundation for Addiction Research (to KJA). Several scholarships, including a University of Alberta Dean's Doctoral Student Award 2021-2022, a University of Alberta Medical Science Graduate Program Scholarship 2020, a University of Alberta Doctoral Recruitment Scholarship 2017 and an Alberta Graduate Excellence Scholarship 2020 provided additional funding for the first author (SJ). A Fulbright-Canada-Palix Foundation grant to Dr. Patrick Carnes facilitated his contributions to study design.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData produced in the present study are available in deidentified format upon reasonable request to the authors.