RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Can accurate demographic information about people who use prescription medications non-medically be derived from Twitter?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.27.22274390
DO 10.1101/2022.04.27.22274390
A1 Yuan-Chi Yang
A1 Mohammed Ali Al-Garadi
A1 Jennifer S. Love
A1 Hannah L. F. Cooper
A1 Jeanmarie Perrone
A1 Abeed Sarker
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/28/2022.04.27.22274390.abstract
AB Traditional surveillance mechanisms for nonmedical prescription medication use (NPMU) involve substantial lags. Social media-based approaches have been proposed for conducting close-to-real-time surveillance, but such methods typically cannot provide fine-grained statistics about subpopulations. We address this gap by developing methods for automatically characterizing a large Twitter NPMU cohort (n=288,562) in terms of age-group, race, and gender. Our methods achieved 0.88 precision (95%-CI: 0.84-0.92) for age-group, 0.90 (95%-CI: 0.85-0.95) for race, and 0.94 accuracy (95%-CI: 0.92-0.97) for gender. We compared the automatically-derived statistics for the NPMU of tranquilizers, stimulants, and opioids from Twitter to statistics reported in traditional sources (eg., the National Survey on Drug Use and Health). Our estimates were mostly consistent with the traditional sources, except for age-group-related statistics, likely caused by differences in reporting tendencies and representations in the population. Our study demonstrates that subpopulation-specific estimates about NPMU may be automatically derived from Twitter to obtain early insights.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number R01DA046619. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Emory University institutional review board (IRB00114235).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Twitter API's use terms and privacy concern but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.