TY - JOUR T1 - Revisiting IgG antibody reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and its potential application to disease diagnosis JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.04.20.22273990 SP - 2022.04.20.22273990 AU - Nuno Sepúlveda AU - João Malato AU - Franziska Sotzny AU - Anna D Grabowska AU - André Fonseca AU - Clara Cordeiro AU - Luís Graça AU - Przemyslaw Biecek AU - Uta Behrends AU - Josef Mautner AU - Francisco Westermeier AU - Eliana M Lacerda AU - Carmen Scheibenbogen Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/25/2022.04.20.22273990.abstract N2 - Infections by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are often at the disease onset of patients suffering from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). However, serological analyses of these infections remain inconclusive when comparing patients with healthy controls. In particular, it is unclear if certain EBV-derived antigens eliciting antibody responses have a biomarker potential for disease diagnosis. With this purpose, we re-analysed a previously published microarray data on the IgG antibody responses against 3,054 EBV-related antigens in 92 patients with ME/CFS and 50 HCs. This re-analysis consisted of constructing different regression models for binary outcomes with the ability to classify patients and HCs. In these models, we tested for a possible interaction of different antibodies with age and gender. When analyzing the whole data set, there were no antibody responses that could be used to distinguish patients from healthy controls. A similar finding was obtained when comparing patients with noninfectious or unknown disease trigger to healthy controls. However, when data analysis was restricted to the comparison between HCs and patients with a putative infection at disease onset, we could identify stronger antibody responses against two candidate antigens (EBNA4_0529 and EBNA6_0070). Using antibody responses to these two antigens together with age and gender, the final classification model had an estimated sensitivity and specificity of 0.833 and 0.720, respectively. This reliable case-control discrimination suggested the use of the antibody levels related to these candidate viral epitopes as biomarkers for disease diagnosis in this subgroup of patients. When a bioinformatic analysis was performed on these epitopes, it revealed a potential molecular mimicry with several human proteins. To confirm these promising findings, a follow-up study will be conducted in a separate cohort of patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNS, EL, and CS received funding from ME Research UK (SCIO Charity Number SC036942) for this project. NS acknowledges funding from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (ref. UIDB/00006/2020), and the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange, Poland (ref. PPN/ULM/2020/1/00069/U/00001). JM and AF are funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (ref. SFRH/BD/149758/2019 and SFRH/BD/147629/2019, respectively). CC work is partially financed by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under the project UIDB/00006/2020. FW acknowledges funding from ME Research UK (SCIO charity number SC036942). EML acknowledges funding from the National Institutes of Health (ref. NIH 2R01AI103629), and the ME Association for the maintenance of the UK ME/CFS Biobank (UKMEB – ME Association (Grant PF8947_ME Association). CS acknowledges funding from the Weidenhammer Zoebele and Lost Voices Foundation, Germany.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAntibody data are available online at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179124.s001. The remaining data are available upon request to Prof. Carmen Scheibenbogen. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179124.s001 ER -