RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Clinical measures of balance and gait cannot differentiate somatosensory impairments in people with lower-limb amputation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.20.22273998
DO 10.1101/2022.04.20.22273998
A1 BA Petersen
A1 PJ Sparto
A1 LE Fisher
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/21/2022.04.20.22273998.abstract
AB Background In addition to a range of functional impairments seen in individuals with a lower-limb amputation, this population is at a substantially elevated risk of falls [1,2]. Studies postulate that the lack of sensory feedback from the prosthetic limb contributes heavily to these impairments, but the extent to which sensation affects functional measures remains unclear [3,4].Research Question The purpose of this study is to determine how sensory impairments in the lower extremities relate to performance with common clinical functional measures of balance and gait in individuals with a lower-limb amputation. Here we evaluate the effects of somatosensory integrity to both clinical and lab measures of static, reactive and dynamic balance, and gait stability.Methods In 20 individuals with lower-limb amputation (AMP) and 20 age and gender-matched able-bodied controls (CON), we evaluated the relationship of measures of sensation (pressure, proprioception, and vibration) to measures of balance and gait. Static, reactive, and dynamic balance were assessed using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Motor Control Test (MCT), and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), respectively. Gait stability was assessed through measures of step length asymmetry and step width variability. Sensation was categorized into intact or impaired sensation by pressure thresholds and differences across groups were analyzed.Results There were significant differences between AMP and CON groups for the reliance on vision for static balance in the SOT, MCT, and FGA (p<0.01). Despite these differences across groups, there were no significant differences within the AMP group based on intact or impaired sensation across all functional measures.Significance Despite being able to detect differences between able-bodied individuals and individuals with an amputation, these functional measures are unable to distinguish between levels of impairment within participants with an amputation. These findings suggest that more challenging and robust metrics are needed to evaluate the relationship of sensation and function in individuals with an amputation.Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health [NINDS Award Number UH3NS100541 and NICHD Award Number F30HD098794]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health [NINDS Award Number UH3NS100541 and NICHD Award Number F30HD098794]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.