PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Christopher Bell AU - Corey Scholes AU - Maha Jegatheesan AU - Kirby Tuckerman TI - The effect of short-graft preparation with tape suspension and screw fixation on loss of knee extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of public hospital cases from 2015 - 2017 AID - 10.1101/2020.04.21.20073494 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.04.21.20073494 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/21/2020.04.21.20073494.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/21/2020.04.21.20073494.full AB - Introduction The short graft with tape suspension (SGTS) is a technique for ACL reconstruction that has gained popularity in recent years. Though the construct utilises a hamstring tendon, its biomechanical properties more closely resemble a stiffer graft such as bone-patella-bone. Due to these properties, there are concerns this technique may increase the likelihood of postoperative loss of extension (LOE), particularly if the surgeon does not modify their tensioning technique. This study compared LOE in patients undergoing ACLR with the SGTS technique, versus other ACLR techniques. We hypothesised that with appropriate technique modifications, the SGTS technique would not be inferior to long hamstring graft techniques with respect to LOE observed clinically during supervised rehabilitation.Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients who received primary ACLR at one of two hospitals between January 2015 and December 2017 and elected to participate in a rehabilitation program with the hospital physiotherapy department. Postoperative knee extension was assessed by a department physiotherapist until satisfactory function was achieved. Patients were classified as SGTS ACLR or non-SGTS ACLR during chart review and LOE compared at initial assessment and at the time of maximum extension, via a noninferiority analysis.Results The grafts for the SGTS group (N=44) were significantly larger in diameter (median 8.5mm vs. 8.0mm, P <0.001) and less incidence of notchplasties (17.8% vs. 44.7%, P <0.001) compared with the non-SGTS group (N=94). The upper 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions between groups did not exceed the non-inferiority margin (0.3 or 30%) at either Initial or Maximum timepoints.Conclusions The SGTS technique was not inferior to other hamstring-graft ACLR techniques with respect to postoperative LOE. Surgeons using or considering using the SGTS construct can rule out increased incidence of LOE as a factor in their decision-making, providing the grafts are prepared according to existing guidance and tensioned in full extension. Further studies are recommended to assess longer term functional outcomes and ultimately treatment success.Competing Interest StatementCorey Scholes holds shares in EBM Analytics, which is contracted to perform registry activities for QEII Jubilee Orthopaedics. No other authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.Funding StatementThis study was funded in full by the Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Orthopaedic Research Fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Metro South Health Human Research Ethics Committee; HREC/16/QPAH/732I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesBlinded data may be available from the authors at reasonable request.