RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 POPULATION ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY RISK: PREDICTIVE MODELS USING MOTION SENSORS FOR 100,000 PARTICIPANTS IN THE UK BIOBANK NATIONAL COHORT
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.20.22274067
DO 10.1101/2022.04.20.22274067
A1 Haowen Zhou
A1 Ruoqing Zhu
A1 Anita Ung
A1 Bruce Schatz
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/21/2022.04.20.22274067.abstract
AB We have developed novel technology for health monitoring, which inputs motion sensors to predictive models of health status. We have validated these models in clinical experiments with carried smartphones, using only their embedded accelerometers. Using smartphones as passive monitors for population measurement is critically important for health equity, since they are ubiquitous in high-income countries already and will become ubiquitous in low-income countries in the near future. Our study simulates smartphones by using accelerometers as sensor input.We analyzed 100,000 participants in UK Biobank who wore activity monitors with motion sensors for 1 week. This national cohort is demographically representative of the UK population, and this dataset represents the largest such available sensor record. We performed population analysis using walking intensity, with participants whose motion during normal activities included daily living equivalent of timed walk tests. We extract continuous features from sensor data, for input to survival analysis for predictive models of mortality risk.Simulating population monitoring, we validated predictive models using only sensors and demographics. This resulted in C-index of 0.76 for 1-year risk decreasing to 0.73 for 5-year. A minimum set of sensor features achieves similar C-index with 0.72 for 5-year risk, which is similar accuracy to previous studies using methods not achievable with phone sensors. The minimum model uses average acceleration, which has predictive value independent of demographics of age and sex, as does the physical measure of gait speed. Our digital health methods achieve the same accuracy as activity monitors measuring total activity, despite using only walking sessions as sensor input, orders of magnitude less than existing methods.AUTHOR SUMMARY Supporting healthcare infrastructure requires screening national populations with passive monitors. That is, looking for health problems without intruding into daily living. Digital health offers potential solutions if sensor devices of adequate accuracy for predictive models are already widely deployed. The only such current devices are cheap phones, smartphone devices with embedded sensors. This limits the measures to motion sensors when the phones are carried during normal activities. So measuring walking intensity is possible, but total activity is not.Our study simulates smartphone sensors to predict mortality risk in the largest national cohort with sensor records, the demographically representative UK Biobank. Death is the most definite outcome, accurate death records are available for 100,000 participants who wore sensor devices some five years ago. We analyzed this dataset to extract walking sessions during daily living, then used these to predict mortality risk. The accuracy achieved was similar to activity monitors measuring total activity and even to physical measures such as gait speed during observed walks. Our scalable methods offer a potential pathway towards national screening for health status.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUniversity of Illinois Internal Funding of $10,000 from Campus Research Board, special designation of Beckman AwardAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:UK Biobank is a major public database insuring all ethical standards for study participants. Our project is approved as Biobank ID 45178. The authors of this paper are all approved investigators of UK Biobank for this study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets analyzed are owned and controlled by UK Biobank, a national research resource in the United Kingdom. As a public resource, all this data and more is available to interested researchers worldwide. However, all such requests must be formally approved by the Biobank and the datasets are not available otherwise.