RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants: a nationwide Danish cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.20.22274061
DO 10.1101/2022.04.20.22274061
A1 Mie Agermose Gram
A1 Hanne-Dorthe Emborg
A1 Astrid Blicher Schelde
A1 Nikolaj Ulrik Friis
A1 Katrine Finderup Nielsen
A1 Ida Rask Moustsen-Helms
A1 Rebecca Legarth
A1 Janni Uyen Hoa Lam
A1 Manon Chaine
A1 Aisha Zahoor Malik
A1 Morten Rasmussen
A1 Jannik Fonager
A1 Raphael Niklaus Sieber
A1 Marc Stegger
A1 Steen Ethelberg
A1 Palle Valentiner-Branth
A1 Christian Holm Hansen
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/20/2022.04.20.22274061.abstract
AB Background The continued occurrence of more contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants and waning immunity over time require ongoing re-evaluation of the vaccine effectiveness (VE). This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness in two age groups (12-59 and 60 years or above) of two and three vaccine doses (BNT162b2 mRNA or mRNA-1273 vaccine) by time since vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization in an Alpha, Delta and Omicron dominated period.Methods A Danish nationwide cohort study design was used to estimate VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron variants. Information was obtained from nationwide registries and linked using a unique personal identification number. The study included all residents in Denmark aged 12 years or above (18 years or above for the analysis of three doses) in the Alpha (February 20 to June 15, 2021), Delta (July 4 to November 20, 2021) and Omicron (December 21, 2021 to January 31, 2022) dominated periods. VE estimates including 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression models with adjustments for age, sex and geographical region. Vaccination status was included as a time-varying exposure.Findings In the oldest age group, VE against infection after two doses was 91.0% (95% CI: 88.5; 92.9) for the Alpha variant, 82.2% (95% CI: 75.3; 87.1) for the Delta variant and 39.9% (95% CI: 26.4; 50.9) for the Omicron variant 14-30 days since vaccination. The VE waned over time and was 71.5% (95% CI: 54.7; 82.8), 49.8% (95% CI: 46.5; 52.8) and 4.7% (95% CI: 0.2; 8.9) >120 days since vaccination against the three variants, respectively. Higher estimates were observed after the third dose with VE estimates against infection of 86.0% (Delta, 95% CI: 83.3; 88.3) and 57.6% (Omicron, 95% CI: 55.8; 59.4) 14-30 days since vaccination. Among both age groups, VE against COVID-19-related hospitalization 14-30 days since vaccination with two or three doses was 94.8% or above for the Alpha and Delta variants, whereas among the youngest age group, VE estimates against the Omicron variant after two and three doses were 62.4% (95% CI: 46.3; 73.6) and 89.8% (95% CI: 87.9; 91.3), respectively.Conclusions Two vaccine doses provided high protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha and Delta variants with protection waning over time. Two vaccine doses provided only limited protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Omicron variant. The third vaccine dose substantially increased the protection against Delta and Omicron.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this workAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data becomes or are already available for research upon reasonable request and with permission from the Danish Data Protection Agency and Danish Health Data Authority. Ethics: We used only administrative register data for the study. According to Danish law, ethics approval is exempt for such research, and the Danish Data Protection Agency, which is a dedicated ethics and legal oversight body, thus waives ethical approval for our study of administrative register data, when no individual contact of participants is neccessary and only aggregate results are included as findings. The study is therefore fully compliant with all legal and ethical requirements and there are no further processes available regarding such studies.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableData cannot be shared publicly due data protection regulation. Data are available from the Danish Health Data Authority for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The data are available for research upon reasonable request and with permission from the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Danish Health Data Authority: https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/english/health_data_and_registers/research_services