PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Curlin, Marcel E. AU - Bates, Timothy A. AU - Guzman, Gaelen AU - Schoen, Devin AU - McBride, Savannah K. AU - Carpenter, Samuel D. AU - Tafesse, Fikadu G. TI - Omicron neutralizing antibody response following booster vaccination compared with breakthrough infection AID - 10.1101/2022.04.11.22273694 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.04.11.22273694 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/12/2022.04.11.22273694.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/12/2022.04.11.22273694.full AB - The rapid spread of the vaccine-resistant Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 presents a renewed threat to both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals, and accelerated booster vaccination campaigns are underway to mitigate the ongoing wave of Omicron cases. The degree of immunity provided by standard vaccine regimens, boosted regimens, and immune responses elicited by the combination of vaccination and natural infection remain incompletely understood. The relative magnitude, quality and durability of serological responses, and the likelihood of neutralizing protection against future SARS-CoV-2 variants following these modes of exposure are unknown but are critical to the future trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study of 99 vaccinated adults, we find that compared with responses after two doses of an mRNA regimen, the immune responses three months after a third vaccine dose and one month after breakthrough infection due to prior variants show dramatic increases in magnitude, potency, and breadth, including increased antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis and robust neutralization of the recently circulating Omicron variant. These results suggest that as the number of Omicron cases rise and as global vaccination and booster campaigns continue, an increasing proportion of the world’s population will acquire potent immune responses that may be protective against future SARS-CoV-2 variants.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a grant from the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust (to M.E.C.), an unrestricted grant from the OHSU Foundation (to M.E.C.), NIH training grant T32HL083808 (to T.A.B.), and OHSU Innovative IDEA grant 1018784 (to F.G.T.). The funders had no role in the conceptualization, conduct or interpretation of this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Oregon Health and Sciences University Institutional review board gave ethical approval for this work (IRB#00022511).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors