PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - W.Y. Chan AU - C. Zhu AU - E. Sanchez AU - R. Gupta AU - A.K Fielding AU - A. Khwaja AU - E.M. Payne AU - J. O’Nions TI - Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with acute leukaemia and high risk MDS on active anti-cancer therapies AID - 10.1101/2022.04.05.22273371 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.04.05.22273371 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273371.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273371.full AB - Patients with haematological malignancies, such as acute leukaemia and high-risk MDS (HR-MDS), have significantly increased mortality and morbidity from COVID-19. However vaccine efficacy in these patients and the impact of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) on vaccine response remains to be fully established. SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in 53 patients with ALL, AML or HR-MDS receiving SACT were characterised following two doses of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1nCoV-19. All patients were tested for anti-S antibodies after 2 doses, 60% after the first dose and anti-N antibody testing was performed on 46 patients (87%). Seropositivity rates after 2 vaccine doses were 95% in AML/HR-MDS patients and 79% in ALL. After stratification by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, naïve patients with AML/HR-MDS had higher seroconversion rates and median anti-S antibody titres compared to ALL (median 291U/mL versus 5.06U/mL), and significant increases in anti-S titres with consecutive vaccine doses, not seen in ALL. No difference was seen in serological response between patients receiving intensive chemotherapy or non-intensive therapies (HMA) but significantly reduced titres were present in AML/HR-MDS patients who received venetoclax-based regimens compared to other therapies. All ALL patients received intensive chemotherapy, with no further impact of anti-CD20 immunotherapy on serological response. Understanding the impact of disease subtypes and therapy on vaccine response is essential to enable decisions on modifying or delaying treatment in the context of either SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEMP is supported by a CRUK Advanced Clinician Scientist Fellowship (Grant No. A24873). RG acknowledges funding from Cure Cancer@ UCL.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All clinical information was recorded and blood samples taken as routine standard of care. Patients were consented to allow any excess serum to be stored and used as part of the UCL Biobank for Studying Health and Disease, Haematology Project, reference no NC10.13, approved by the Leeds (East) Research Ethics Committee, UK. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript